MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Original version. I believe that it is an elementary question, already discussed somewhere. But I just have no idea of how to start it properly. Take a positive integer $n=n_1$ and compute its sum of digits $n_2=S(n)=S_{10}(n)$ in the decimal system. If the newer number $n_2$ is greater than $10$, then compute the sum $n_3=S(n_2)$ of its digits, and continue this iteration $n_k=S(n_{k-1})$ unless you get a number $n^* =n_\infty$ in the range $1\le n^* \le 9$. Is $n^*$ uniformly distributed in the set $\lbrace 1,2,\dots,9\rbrace$? If this is not true in the decimal systems, what can be said in the other systems?

I just learned yesterday about the Feng shui system of determining what kind of problems/advantages one can get according to the house number, say $n$, of his/her home. This depends on the above $n^* $. I do not seriously count on the conclusions but I am curious whether $n^* $ is sufficiently democratic.

Edit. The question was immediately realized as obvious, because $n^*$ is the residue modulo $9$ (with 0 replaced by 9), and this works in any base as well. So the Feng shui function is really trivial, but one can deal with less trivial ones.

Let me fix $m$ and define $Q_m(n)$ as the sum of $m$th powers of decimal digits of a positive integer $n$. What can be said about the sequence of iterations $n_k=Q_m(n_{k-1})$ for a given integer $n_0$? How long can the (minimal) period be for a fixed $m$? And what can be said about the distribution of the purely periodic tails?

I hope that the question is still elementary.

share|cite|improve this question
I've always wanted to respond to a question by saying this: I don't know. And it's true. – Will Jagy Jun 4 '10 at 4:56

The case $m=2$ appears in Hugo Steinhaus's "One Hundred Problems In Elementary Mathematics", problem 2(at least in Russian edition of 1986). Either sequence will come to 1 and stay here, or will enter to the cycle (145,42,20,4,16,37,58,89)

share|cite|improve this answer
Thanks, Nurdin! The last time I read the book (in Russian, of course) was at least 25 years ago, but I am back to it after your hint. The things are really surprising to me... – Wadim Zudilin Jun 4 '10 at 6:47
If they end in 1, they are called "Happy Numbers". Check Wikipedia. Their distribution up to 10**7000 can be found here: <>; – Stefan Gruenwald Jun 28 '14 at 7:00

A starting place might be which lists $n$-digit numbers $r$ with $Q_n(r)=r$, and has references to related oddities.

share|cite|improve this answer
Oh-oh, I did not expect that there was research in this direction... These are narcissistic numbers ( In "A Mathematician's Apology", G. H. Hardy wrote: "There are just four numbes, after unity, which are the sums of the cubes of their digits: $$ 153 = 1^3 + 5^3 + 3^3, \quad 370 = 3^3 + 7^3 + 0^3, \quad 371 = 3^3 + 7^3 + 1^3, \quad 407 = 4^3 + 0^3 + 7^3. $$ These are odd facts, very suitable for puzzle columns and likely to amuse amateurs, but there is nothing in them which appeals to the mathematician." I probably have to count myself an amateur. – Wadim Zudilin Jun 4 '10 at 6:45

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.