MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let $\mathcal P_n$ denote the set of all monic polynomials of degree $n$ with real or complex coefficients such that $P\in\mathcal P_n$ if for all $k\in\lbrace 0,1,\dots,n-2\rbrace$ the $n-k$ roots of $P^{(k)}=\left(\frac{d}{dx}\right)^kP$ are in strictly convex position (ie are the $n-k$ vertices of a convex polygon with $n-k$ extremal vertices).

The set $\mathcal P_n$ is clearly an open subset of all monic polynomials of degree $n$ over $\mathbb R$ or $\mathbb C$.

What is the geometry and topology of $\mathcal P_n$?


(1) Over the reals, $\mathcal P_n$ has at least $2^{n-1}$ connected components: Indeed, consider a very fast decreasing sequence (I guess $n\longmapsto 1/((1+n)^{(1+n)^{1+n}})!$ will probably work) of strictly positive reals $\alpha_0 > \alpha_1 > \cdots$ and a sequence of signs $\epsilon_0,\epsilon_1,\ldots,\epsilon_{n-2}\in\lbrace \pm 1\rbrace$. Then
$$x^n+\sum_{k=0}^{n-2}\epsilon_k\alpha_k x^k\in \mathcal P_n(\mathbb R)$$ and different choices of signs correspond to different connected components. Are there other connected components?

(2) Over the complex numbers, all the polynomials described in (1) are in the same connected component. Choosing $\epsilon_i$ on the complex unit circle suggests however that $\pi_1(\mathcal C_n)$ might be $\mathbb Z^{n-1}$ where $\mathcal C_n$ denotes the connected component of $x^n+\sum_{k=0}^{n-2}\alpha_kx^k$ in $\mathcal P_n(\mathbb C)$. Do we have $\mathcal C_n=\mathcal P_n(\mathbb C)$?

(3) We have the equalities $\mathcal P_{n-1}=\lbrace P'/n \ |\ P\in\mathcal P_n\rbrace$.

share|cite|improve this question
Ī̲ have some ideas how to prove $\mathcal C_n=\mathcal P_n(\mathbb C)$ and, similarly, to make a retraction of the real case to components described by the OP. Still searching for a suitable compactification of $\mathcal P_n$ because Ī̲ detest to construct ε–δ proofs. – Incnis Mrsi Aug 24 '15 at 22:36
I am not sure of why all these real polynomials are in different CCs. Do you pretend that if a coefficient of degree $\le n-2$ is zero, then $P$ is not in ${\mathcal P)_n$ ? That seems wrong for the constant coefficient. – Denis Serre Jul 5 at 12:57

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.