MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Suppose that $f: X \rightarrow Y$ is a morphism between algebraic varieties. If $Y$ is smooth, and the fibers of $f$ over closed points of $Y$ are proper and nonsingular, does it follow that $X$ is smooth?

Update: The answer to the question as posed, is NO. See a comment by Karl Schwede below for a counterexample.

Modified question: Let $f$ be a surjective morphism of algebraic varieties (reduced, irreducible, separated schemes, finite type over an algebraically closed field). Let $x \in X$ be a closed point and let $y = f(x)$. Just because the fiber $f^{-1}(y)$ is smooth does not mean $X$ is smooth at $x$. What if $X \times_Y Spec \mathcal{O}_y/m^n$ is smooth over $Spec \mathcal{O}_y/m^n$ for every positive integer n - is $X$ smooth at $x$? Here $m$ is the maximal ideal of the local ring at $y$.

Is there any condition on $f$ or the fibers which will guarantee smoothness of the total space? Flatness plus smooth fibers is one, is there anything weaker?

share|cite|improve this question
In the modified question, the scheme-theoretic fibre of f over $\mathcal{O}_{y}/\mathfrak{m}^n$ will be nonreduced for n>1, and hence not a regular scheme --- am I misinterpreting the question? – Mike Roth Jun 1 '10 at 19:53
No, it wasn't carefully thought out. Thanks - now it is more open ended. – unknown Jun 1 '10 at 20:31

No. The blow up of a point on the plane provides a counterexample. You need to add flatness.

Added: It seems I answered something different from what was asked. Perhaps someone can answer the actual question, which isn't so clear to me.

10 seconds later: It looks like Karl Schwede has a counterexample below.

share|cite|improve this answer
The blowup of a smooth variety along a smooth subvariety is still smooth though? – unknown Jun 1 '10 at 14:41
I'm asking about the domain X, not the morphism f. – unknown Jun 1 '10 at 15:00
OK, sorry. I misread your question. – Donu Arapura Jun 1 '10 at 15:06
Modifying Donu's example very slightly, blow up the ideal $(x^2, y^2)$. You have two charts, one is $k[x, y, (y/x)^2] = k[a,b,c]/(a^2*c - b)$ and the other is the other obvious (and symmetric) one. This chart isn't smooth, the fiber over the closed point $(x, y)$ is $k[c]$. – Karl Schwede Jun 1 '10 at 15:11
Ah, I think you are right (though you mean b^2 in your formula). Thanks, is there any other condition on the situation (besides flatness) which would guarantee that the domain is smooth or is it just hopeless? – unknown Jun 1 '10 at 15:33

An even more basic example: take $X$ to be any singular affine variety, and $f$ to be the inclusion of $X$ into the affine space $\mathbb{A}^N$.

share|cite|improve this answer
That is a good point, I should probably include surjetive. – unknown Jun 1 '10 at 19:14

I think the answer is no. Consider the case where $X$ is the two coordinate axes in $\mathbb{A}^2$ (corresponding to the ring $\mathbb{C}[x,y]/(xy)$) and $f$ is the projection onto the first axis (corresponding to $\mathbb{C}[x] \to \mathbb{C}[x,y]/(xy)$). Then the fibers of this map are a point, except over zero where the fiber is an $\mathbb{A}^1.$

I realize that this map is not proper, but I'm sure you could modify this example so that the map is proper.

share|cite|improve this answer
Nice example, but for me, an algebraic variety includes irreducible... – unknown Jun 1 '10 at 15:37

I apologize for answering such an old question, but it seems fundamental. A classical counterexample occurs for the abel map of a Prym variety with exceptional singularities on the theta divisor. The point is that the fibers of the abel prym map X-->Y of the double cover C'-->C are included among those for the abel map of C', hence are all smooth. (A map obtained by restricting another map over a subvariety of the target has the same fibers.)

Nonetheless X is singular at any exceptional divisor. (see lemma 2.13 of

The point of the previous paper was that generalizing the Riemann - Kempf singularity theorem to prym varieties is easy when X is smooth. But when X is singular it is considerably harder:

For a detailed discussion of the case of the abel prym map for a prym variety isomorphic to the intermediate jacobian of the cubic threefold, see:

The answer is yes however if the target Y is a smooth curve, since X is smooth at any point lying on a smooth cartier divisor, (compare Mumford, chap.7, Prop. 2, redbook.)

share|cite|improve this answer

Here is an example where all the spaces involved are irreducible.

Let Y = variety of nilpotent 2 by 2 matrices.

X = variety of pairs (N, F) where N is in Y and F is a line preserved by N.

Let f : X -> Y be the natural projection. Now X is certainly smooth (as the projection to P^1 is a smooth morphism) and the fibres of f are points or P^1's. But Y is not regular.

share|cite|improve this answer
That's backwards. He wants an example where Y is smooth but X is not. – David Speyer Jun 1 '10 at 18:08

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.