# Why 1.5IQR whiskers in boxplot? [closed]

Hi math people.

I'm in the process of analyzing some data that I collected through an experiment. The data are (somewhat) normally distributed and I represent the different data-sets using boxplot, to provide an easy way of visually comparing the mean between the data-sets and the change in the variance.

In Matlab as default, the whiskers are used to represent all samples lying within 1.5 times the IQR. According to Wikipedia on the boxplot, this is one of several way of using the whiskers. My question is simple why? What special significance does 1.5 times IQR have? Why not e.g. three times sigma?

(NB: I wanted to add the tags "matlab" and "boxplot", but I'm unable to create new tags.)

-

## closed as off-topic by Alex Degtyarev, José Figueroa-O'Farrill, coudy, Stefan Kohl, Joonas IlmavirtaApr 17 '15 at 13:17

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

• "MathOverflow is for mathematicians to ask each other questions about their research. See Math.StackExchange to ask general questions in mathematics." – Alex Degtyarev, José Figueroa-O'Farrill, coudy, Stefan Kohl, Joonas Ilmavirta
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

This won't answer your question, but you should note that you are misusing the word "sample". The whole set of numbers that you've got is your sample; the individual numbers are not samples; they're observations within a sample. It doesn't seem clear what is meant by "within 1.5 times the IQR". Does that mean within that distance of the median? Or the mean? Or maybe of the quartiles? Or what? – Michael Hardy May 30 '10 at 23:47
@Michael Thanks for the input. I have always thought of samples as the single "elements" of data you collect e.g. during an experiment or from a signal (as in sampling a signal, which results in a lot of samples from a sampled signal.) So a sample is a set of observations collected through a single trial(?). Do you have a source on this, just so I can get a clear understand of the correct use of the words? – bjarkef Jun 1 '10 at 18:09

Three sigma has less relevance for asymmetric distributions. Using quartiles keeps it nonparametric. Regarding why not other quantiles of the distribution rather than 1.5*IQR, you can follow some comments on this thread, which basically argues that you want to avoid specifying a fixed fraction of your data to be flagged as 'outliers'.

-

First of all, you should note the difference between statistics and robust statistics. Do not compare the standard deviation (sigma) which is a non robust measure of how the data scatters with the robust IQR.

Second, why 1.5 times the IQR? Since you are a Matlab user, try the following commands :

x = normrnd(0,1,1000000,1);
Q = quantile(x,[0.25 0.5 0.75]);
IQR = Q(3) - Q(1);
w1 = Q(1) - 1.5 * IQR;
w2 = Q(3) + 1.5 * IQR;
p = normcdf(w2) - normcdf(w1);


You will see that p is 0.99, so that 99% of N(0,1) data are within the whiskers. This may be the reason why Tukey chose this.

-