MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Given two modules $M$ and $N$ there is a nice scheme parametrizing extensions

$0 \rightarrow M \rightarrow E \rightarrow N \rightarrow 0$

namely $Ext^1(N,M)$ or, leaving out the trivial extension, the projective space $P(Ext^1(N,M))$.

There are (at least) two natrual generalizations

  1. n-step extensions

    $M \rightarrow E_1 \rightarrow E_2 \rightarrow \dots \rightarrow E_n \rightarrow N$

    between $N$ and $M$.

  2. Filtered modules: Parametrize modules $E$ which admit a filtration

    $0 \subset F_1 \subset F_2 \dots F_n=E$

    with fixed graded objects $E_i=F_i/F_{i-1}$.

I suppose in the first case one can use the group Ext^n(M,N), although I never saw a construction of a universal family. Is there a good reference?

In the second case, I do not have a clue. So my main question is:

Is there a nice moduli space of filtered objects?

share|cite|improve this question
As you probably know $\mathrm{Ext}^n$ does not parameterise $n$-fold extensions directly but rather certain equivalence classes of them. The equivalence relation is the smallest with the property that $M\to E_1\to E_2\to\cdots \to N$ and $M\to F_1\to F_2\to\cdots \to N$ are equivalent when there's a chain map between them which is the identity on $M$ and $N$. When $n\ge2$ onw can add on an arbitrary module to $E_1$ and $E_2$ and get an equivalent $n$-step extension, so the equivalence classes are proper classes :-) – Robin Chapman May 21 '10 at 13:21

I. In the first case, you can use the fact that if $$\cdots\to P_n\to P_{n-1}\to\cdots\to P_1\to P_0$$ is a projective resolution of $N$, then every Yoneda $n$-extension of $M$ by $N$ can be represented an extension of the form $$ 0\to M\to E\to P_{n-2}\to P_{n-3}\to\cdots \to P_1\to P_0\to N\to 0$$ and where $E$ is a module which is constructed as a pushout of a diagram of the form $$M\leftarrow P_n\rightarrow P_1$$ This gets you a sensible set of representatives of $n$-extensions (the isomorphism classes of $n$-extensions, as opposed to equivalece classes, do not form a set, so one needs to do something like this) which you can probably make into a scheme. You next want to quotient by equivalence---I do not see immediately how that'll work.

II. For the second case, and if you are considering finite dimensional modules over a finitely generated algebra $A$, you can construct an analogue of the representation variety $\mathrm{Rep}_d(A)$ for filtered modules with specific subquotients. For example, suppose you want a variety of modules $M$ of total dimension $d$ with a filtration $0=F_0\subseteq F_1\subseteq F_2\subseteq F_3=M$ such that $F_1/F_0\cong N_1$, $F_2/F_2\cong N_2$ and $F_3/F_2\cong N_3$. Up to isomorphism, you can suppose that $M=k^d$, and that the $F_i$ are a standard partial flag (so that $F_i$ is the subspace of $k^d$ of vectors whose last $d-\dim F_i$ coordinates vanish)

The action of $M$ is then completely given by $n$ $d$-by-$d$ matrices, where $n$ is the size of a generating set of $A$, and the fact that $M$ is an actual module, that chosen filtration is a module filtration, and that the subquotients are what they should be can be expressed in terms of polynomial equations involving the coefficients of those $n$ matrices.

This determines a scheme, whose points are $A$-module structures on $k^d$ which satisfy the desired conditions, and which contain representatives of all isoclasses of modules satisfying those conditions. Of course, the points of this scheme are not in correspondence with isoclasses: to do that, you need to pass to the quotient by the appropriate change-of-basis group (but that will kill the scheme structure, I guess...)

share|cite|improve this answer
Thanks for your answer. Your hint for the first point is really helpful. Ad II) I have seen people (e.g. Reineke arXiv:0802.2147) doing the moduli of quiver representations using a similar construction and GIT quotients. So I am confident that one can produce a sheme in the way you described. However, the application I have in mind goes as follows. Suppose $E_i$ are sheaves on an algebraic variety and $E_i$ are stable in some stability cndition. How many sheaves $E$ have a Hader-Narasimhan filtration with semi-stable factors $E_i$? In this case Artin-Algebras are only of limited help. – Heinrich Hartmann May 22 '10 at 9:42
I can almost guarantee that a scheme structure does NOT exist on such a quotient. In fact, unless I misunderstood something, this is more or less equivalent to the problem of describing a moduli space of $n\times n$-matrices up to conjugacy. And this can never exist as a moduli space, even in a coarse sense. See the paper by Mumford and Suominen "An introduction to the theory of moduli", 1970. – Daniel Larsson May 22 '10 at 14:18
@Daniel, that really depends on the starting data. For example, if the algebra $A$ is the group algebra of a finite group (over a field of characteristic zero) you do get a (zero-dimensional) scheme. – Mariano Suárez-Alvarez May 24 '10 at 15:50

Hi Heinrich,

in the situation you have in mind (sheaves on an algebraic variety), such spaces are not too difficult to construct as Artin stacks. If you omit the condition that the i-th filtration quotient is isomorphic to a given one, then such a universal Artin stack is e.g. constructed in Bridgeland's introduction to Hall-algebras (arXiv:1002.4372, he calls them $\mathcal M^{(n)}$), but of course also in earlier articles by Joyce. Basically it follows from the existence of relative quot schemes.

These universal extension stacks have evaluation morphisms to $\mathcal M$, the stack of all sheaves, sending the filtration to its i-th quotients, so you can take a base change via the map from $\Spec k \to \mathcal M \times \dots \times \mathcal M$ given by your set of objects $E_i$, and the fiber product will be the Artin stack you are looking for.

If you want a scheme instead of an Artin stack - then I would ask back "why?" :) Nevertheless, it would be useful to understand this fiber product better when $n > 2$.

share|cite|improve this answer

Hi Heinrich!

I don't know. But you could take a look at Carlos Simpson's general definition of "filtered object" on pages 24/25 of his paper The Hodge filtration on non-abelian cohomology: Roughly, a filtered X is a $\mathbb{G}_m$-equivariant map from an X to $\mathbb{A}^1$, so you could get your moduli space as a mapping space, or as an object of the "comma site" of maps of objects of your site into $\mathbb{A}^1$...

share|cite|improve this answer
Dear Peter, thanks for your answer. Unfortunately I do not see how to apply this construction to the question. It seems to me that this gives an answer to the "inverse" problem of parametrizing filtrations of a given object. – Heinrich Hartmann May 21 '10 at 14:50
Well, I had thought that maybe you could look at the fibered category of all modules over the comma site/A^1. Since the fiber over 0 gives the graded object, you could maybe form a pullback where you fix the desired quotients of the filtration... But all of this is wild speculation from a layman and may be nonsense! If you like, I delete this answer to attract others! – Peter Arndt May 21 '10 at 15:41
At least it's abstract nonsense :) – Lars May 21 '10 at 18:19

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.