MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top


I'm looking for an argument that the n-dimensional stereographic projection maps circles (intersections of affine two-dimensional subspaces with S^n) to circles in R^n. I've looked around and the only argument I saw for the n-dimensional case is a generalization of the geometric proof for n = 2 (with the tangent cone) which I don't really feel comfortable with, even when n = 2. Is it possible to reduce it to the n = 2 case somehow or give a "direct", algebraic, proof?

share|cite|improve this question
It is of course possible to do a direct computation. It might be ugly, though. – Benoît Kloeckner May 19 '10 at 17:38

The circle and the north pole (or wherever the origin of the stereographic projection is) span a 3-dimensional subspace generically, such that the restriction to this subspace is the 2-dimensional stereographic projection. If the circle goes through the north pole, then it is actually sent to a line under stereographic projection, and this is in some sense a reduction to the 1-dimensional case.

Yana Mohanty has a nice proof that stereographic projection sends circles to circles.

A more sophisticated approach is to notice that stereographic projection is the restriction of inversion through a sphere orthogonal to $S^n$ in $R^{n+1}\subset S^{n+1}$. Then one needs to see that inversions send circles to circles, or more generally that Mobius transformations of $S^n$ do. The group of Mobius transformations of $S^n$ is $PO(n+1,1)$ or $Isom(\mathbb{H}^{n+1})$, the isometry group of hyperbolic $n+1$-space. This groups preserves the cone $x_0^2+x_1^2 +\cdots - x_{n+1}^2=0$. The sphere at infinity (in the projectivization) of this cone is $S^n$, and the action is by the Mobius group. A circle is the intersection of the projective closure of a 3-dimensional subspace with the sphere at infinity. Since $PO(n+1,1)$ consists of linear transformations, it permutes 3-dimensional subspaces of $R^{n+1,1}$, and therefore sends circles to circles in the projectivization.

share|cite|improve this answer

I don't know what is the "tangent cone" argument you mention, but anyway here is my favorite proof of the fact.

The stereographic projection is the restriction of an inversion $I$ from $\mathbb R^{n+1}\setminus \{p\}$ to itself, where $p$ is the pole from which you project (or maybe $I$ is a map from $\mathbb R^{n+1}\cup\{\infty\}$ to itself if you prefer it this way). So it suffices to prove that $I$ sends circles to circles and lines.

First observe that $I$ sends $n$-spheres and hyperplanes to $n$-spheres and hyperplanes. (This follows from the planar case with circles and lines and rotation symmetry. The planar case is elementary). In $\mathbb R^3$, every circle is an intersection of two spheres. Hence its image is an intersection of two sets each of which is a sphere or a plane. Such set is a circle again.

In higher dimensions, either restrict to a suitable 3-dimensional subspace, as Agol said in his answer, or represent a circle as an intersection of several spheres.

share|cite|improve this answer
I'm guessing the tangent cone approach amounts to that in section 36 of the book by David Hilbert and S. Cohn-Vossen, in English "Geometry and the Imagination," the original "Anschauliche Geometrie." (1932) – Will Jagy May 20 '10 at 2:26

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.