MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

The symmetric product of a variety $M$ is the quotient of $M^n/S_n$ where $S_n$ is the symmetric group permuting components of n-fold product $M^n$. IF $M$ is an affine plane $C^k$ over complex numbers, the coordinate ring of the symmetric product is the invariant polynomials in $R:=C[x^1_1,...,x^1_k, x^2_1,...,x^2_k,... ,x^n_1,...,x^n_k]$ under the action of $S_n$ where $S_n$ permutes the variables $x_i^1,...,x_i^n$ simultaneously for $i=1,...,k$. I want to know the invariant subring $R^{S_n}$ in terms of generators and relations. Could anybody help me?

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 5 down vote accepted

Those invariant polynomials are called multisymmetric functions. There are several papers on them; you could start with J. Dalbec, Multisymmetric functions, Beiträge Algebra Geom. 40(1) (1999), 27-51

share|cite|improve this answer

The relations might be complicated. The multisymmetric functions of degree up to n generate the ring, but very redundantly. In Lemma 2.2 of

Venkatesh and I show that you can get by with using many fewer of these multisymmetric functions, if you are content to generate a subring of R^{S_n} whose fraction field is finite-index in the fraction field of R^{S_n}.

share|cite|improve this answer

I may be making a very trivial mistake [Edit: yes, indeed], but isn't it just that:


with affine coordinate ring $\mathbb{C}[\sigma_1,\cdots,\sigma_n]^{\otimes k}$ (where $\sigma_d=\sigma_d(x_1,\cdots,x_n)$ is the degree-$d$ symmetric function in the $n$ variables $x_1,\cdots, x_n$) ?

share|cite|improve this answer
Your third isomorphism requires an identification between Sn and (Sn)^k. – S. Carnahan May 14 '10 at 16:49
I mean, if $G$ acts on $X$ and $Y$, and diagonally on $X\times Y$, then $(X\times Y)/G\cong (X/G)\times (Y/G)$. Is it correct, right? – Qfwfq May 14 '10 at 17:07
$(G\times G)/G\not\cong(G/G)\times(G/G)$ – user2035 May 14 '10 at 17:16
The equality I wrote above absolutely doesn't work! For example, if $G$ has positive dimension, the "expected" dimentions of the two sides do not match. – Qfwfq May 14 '10 at 17:50

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.