0
$\begingroup$

For simplicity let us assume we are considering $\mathbb{R}^3$. Let us define the weighted Sobolev norm $\| u \|^2_{L^2_{\alpha}}= \int_{\mathbb{R}^3} |u|^2 \langle x\rangle^{\alpha}$ where $\langle x \rangle = (1+|x|^2)^{\frac{1}{2}}$

Let $ S = \{x\in \mathbb{R}^3: a<x_1<b \}$. Note the following easy Poincaré inequality first: $\| \partial_1 u \|_{L^2(S)} > \frac{\sqrt{2}}{b-a} \|u\|_{L^2(S)}$ for all $ u \in C^{\infty}_c(S)$.

My question is whether I can write the above inequality globally using weights. Let $-1<\delta <1 $ and $\delta $ is not equal to zero. Prove that there exist a constant C such that:

$\| \partial_1 u \|_{L^2_{\delta+1}} > C \|u\|_{L^2_{\delta-1}}$ for all $ u \in C^{\infty}_c (\mathbb{R}^3)$ ?

Also prove that the following stronger inequality also holds at least for values of $\delta$ sufficiently close to $-1$: $ 4 \| \partial_1 u \|^2_{L^2_{\delta+1}} - (\delta+1)^2 \int x_1^2 \langle x \rangle^{\delta-3}u^2 \geq C \|u\|^2_{L^2_{\delta-1}} $

Thanks,

Comment: I have a way of proving both these hypothesis in a way different to the solution below. I will post the solution later if there was any interest.

$\endgroup$
1
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Please do go ahead and post your own proof as an answer! $\endgroup$ Jul 19, 2016 at 17:30

1 Answer 1

3
$\begingroup$

$$\int \partial_1 (\langle x\rangle^{\delta-1} x_1 u^2) \mathrm{d}x = 0 $$ So $$ \int [ (\delta - 1) \langle {x}\rangle^{\delta - 3} |x_1|^2 + \langle{x}\rangle^{\delta - 1}] u^2 ~\mathrm{d}x = -\int 2 \langle x\rangle^{\delta - 1} x_1 u \partial_1 u ~\mathrm{d}x $$ so by C-S $$ | \mathrm{LHS} | \leq 2 \left( \langle x\rangle^{\delta - 3}|x_1|^2 u^2 ~\mathrm{d}x\right)^\frac12 \left( \langle x\rangle^{\delta + 1} (\partial_1 u)^2 ~\mathrm{d}x\right)^\frac12 $$

So as long as $\delta > 0$ your desired inequality holds by one further application of Young's inequality to the RHS and absorbing the undifferentiated factor on the left, and noting that $(\delta - 1)|x_1|^2 + \langle x\rangle^2 \gtrsim \langle x\rangle^2$ when $\delta > 0$.


For $\delta = 0$ the inequality is false. Let $u_\lambda = \phi(\lambda^{-1} x_1) \psi(x_2,x_3)$ where $\psi$ has compact support and $\phi$ is equal to $1$ on $[-1,1]$ and $0$ outside $[-2,2]$. You have that for all $\lambda > 1$, $\|\partial_1 u_\lambda\|_{L^2_1}$ is bounded. But $\|u_\lambda\|_{L^{2}_{-1}} \gtrsim \sqrt{\log(\lambda)}$ as $\lambda \nearrow \infty$.

$\endgroup$
5
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you @Willie Wong for the nice proof. I think a sharper version of the estimate holds for at least some $\delta$ near zero that I have added to the question. Do you have any insights on that? $\endgroup$
    – Ali
    Jul 16, 2016 at 15:35
  • $\begingroup$ Your "sharper" inequality is not sharper in any way. Note that $\int \langle x\rangle^{\delta - 3} |x_1|^2 u^2 \leq \|u\|^2_{L^2_{d-1}}$. What you want follows immediately from what has been proven. Note that in my answer the constant $C$ depends on $\delta$ and degenerates as $\delta \searrow 0$. $\endgroup$ Jul 17, 2016 at 2:07
  • $\begingroup$ I don't think that is true. The constant coming out of your proof is $(\frac{\delta}{2})^2$ which is not strong enough to conclude the proof since $d+1 >d$ $\endgroup$
    – Ali
    Jul 17, 2016 at 2:15
  • $\begingroup$ Ah, I see what you mean. Then I don't have the answer handy. $\endgroup$ Jul 17, 2016 at 2:19
  • $\begingroup$ I think that the inequality also works for $-1<\delta <0$ but the proof will be probably harder! $\endgroup$
    – Ali
    Jul 19, 2016 at 0:51

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.