2
$\begingroup$

Let $A$ be an abelian surface over algebraically closed field $k$ of characteristic $p > 2$. How to prove that $A$ is supersingular (in other words, there is an isogeny between $A$ and $E^2$, where $E$ is a supersingular elliptic curve) iff the Picard number $\rho(A)$ is equal to the second $l$-adic Betti number $b_2(A) = 6$? The proof is contained in Shioda's article "Algebraic cycles on certain K3 surfaces in characteristic $p$", but I can't find it.

Is this theorem right if $k$ is a finite field, $\rho(A)$ is redefined by $\rho(A) := \mathrm{rank}(NS_k(A))$ (divisors over $k$), and the isogeny is defined over $k$?

$\endgroup$

2 Answers 2

3
$\begingroup$

Now let $k$ be a finite field. If $E$ is an elliptic curve over $k$ then $End(E)\otimes\mathbf{Q}$ is either an imaginary quadratic field or a definite quaternion algebra over $\mathbf{Q}$.

Warning: $E$ may be supersingular even if $End(E)\otimes\mathbf{Q}$ is an imaginary quadratic field; this means that not all endomorphisms of $E$ are defined over $k$.

Again, if $A$ is not $k$-simple then it is isogenous either to a product $E_1\times E_2$ of two mutually non-isogenous elliptic curves $E_1$ and $E_2$ over $k$ (and $\rho(A)=2$) or to a square $E^2$ of an elliptic curve $E$ over $K$ (and $\rho(A)=4$ or $6$). More precisely, $\rho(A)=6$ if and only if $A$ is isogenous to $E^2$ where $E$ is a supersingular elliptic curve, all whose endomorphisms are defined over $k$. (Indeed, it may happen that both $E_1$ and $E_2$ are supersingular but not isogenous over $k$ and then $\rho(A)=2$)

If $A$ is simple then one of the following conditions holds.

I) $End(A)\otimes \mathbf{Q}$ is a CM-field of degree $4$ and $\rho(A)=2$.

2) $End(A)\otimes \mathbf{Q}$ is a quaternion algebra over an imaginary quadratic field. Then $A$ is supersingular but not all its endomorphisms are defined over $k$ and $\rho(A)=4$.

3) $End(A)\otimes \mathbf{Q}$ is a totally definite quaternion algebra over a real quadratic field. Then $A$ is supersingular but not all its endomorphisms are defined over $k$ and $\rho(A)=2$. (See Tate's Bourbaki talk http://archive.numdam.org/ARCHIVE/SB/SB_1968-1969__11_/SB_1968-1969__11__95_0/SB_1968-1969__11__95_0.pdf for a classification of simple abelian varieties over finite fields up to an isogeny.)

In the cases 2) and 3) $A$ becomes isogenous to a square of a supersingular elliptic curve over an algebraic closure of $k$.

$\endgroup$
0
4
$\begingroup$

If $A$ is not simple then it is isogenous to a product $E_1 \times E_2$ of elliptic curves $E_1$ and $E_2$, and the Picard numbers of $A$ and $E_1\times E_2$ do coincide. If $E_1$ is not isogenous to $E_2$ then $\rho(E_1 \times E_2)=2,$ which is not the case. Therefore, $A$ is isogenous to a square $E^2$ of an elliptic curve $E=E_1$. It is known that $End(E)\otimes\mathbf{Q}$ is either the field $\mathbf{Q}$ of rational numbers or an imaginary quadratic field or a definite quaternion algebra over $\mathbf{Q}$ (in the latter case $E$ is a supersingular elliptic curve and $\rho(E^2)=6$.) Clearly, in the first case $\rho(E^2)=3$, in the second case $\rho(E^2)=4$. So, if $A$ is non-simple then it is isogenous to a square of a supersingular elliptic curve.

Suppose $A$ is simple. Here is the list of all possible division algebras $End(A)\otimes\mathbf{Q}$ over $\mathbf{Q}$ (see Section 6 of F. Oort, Endomorphism algebras of abelian varieties, MR0977774 (90j:11049)).

  1. $\mathbf{Q}$, a real quadratic field, a CM field of degree 4 over $\mathbf{Q}$. In this case $\rho(A)=1$ (in the first case) or $2$ (in the remaining cases).
  2. An indefinite quaternion algebra over $\mathbf{Q}$. In this case $\rho(A)=3$. (You may find the description of the corresponding $NS(A)\otimes\mathbf{Q}$ in Sect. 21 of Mumford's Abelian varieties). This implies that $A$ is not simple, which finishes the proof when $k$ is algebraically closed.
$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you. Am I right that all proof is carried to finite fields case unless supersingular elliptic curves over $\mathbb{F}_q$ need not be isogenous over $\mathbb{F}_q$? Hence $\rho(A/\mathbb{F}_q) = 6$ iff $A$ is $\mathbb{F}_q$-supersingular, but $A$ can be $\mathbb{F}_q$-isogenous a direct product of two $\mathbb{F}_q$-non-isogenous supersingular elliptic curves over $\mathbb{F}_q$ with $\rho(A/\mathbb{F}_q) = 2$. $\endgroup$ Jun 16, 2016 at 18:05

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.