5
$\begingroup$

What is the group of automorphisms of $l^{\infty}$?

I think it would be the permutations of the integers. Is this right?

$\endgroup$
7
  • $\begingroup$ The automorphism group of $l^\infty(X)$ will depend on what $X$ is. Also, what structure do you require automorphisms to preserve? $\endgroup$
    – Colin Reid
    May 2, 2016 at 1:42
  • $\begingroup$ $l^{\infty}(\mathbb{Z})$. The automorphisms have to preserve the $W^{*}$-algebra structure. $\endgroup$
    – epsilon
    May 2, 2016 at 1:49
  • $\begingroup$ So do you require that the automorphisms are weak-star continuous? (This might come for free, but I haven't thought deeply about it) $\endgroup$
    – Yemon Choi
    May 2, 2016 at 4:50
  • $\begingroup$ @YemonChoi, no it doesn't come for free. Every homeo of $\beta\mathbb{Z}$ will give an auto, but only these which will preserve $\mathbb{Z}$ will give rise to weak* continuous ones. $\endgroup$
    – Uri Bader
    May 2, 2016 at 10:07
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @user89334: yes it does come for free. Every homeo of $\beta \mathbb{Z}$ comes from a permutation of the integers, and every C*-automorphism of $l^\infty(\mathbb{Z})$ is an order-isomorphism, hence is normal, hence is weak*-continuous. $\endgroup$
    – Nik Weaver
    May 2, 2016 at 11:55

3 Answers 3

7
$\begingroup$

This is to record what is probably the easiest proof (that the answer is "yes"), following a remark by Nik Weaver.

Noting that $\ell^\infty(\mathbb{Z})\simeq C(\beta\mathbb{Z})$, using Banach-Stone, we see that every auto gives a homeo of $\beta\mathbb{Z}$. But since $\mathbb{Z}$ is the subset of isolated points, every homeo preseves it, and since it is dense the homeo is determined by its restriction to $\mathbb{Z}$.

$\endgroup$
3
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ Equivalently, but maybe slightly easier, (in the sense that one doesn't have to use the correspondence $\ell^\infty(\mathbb{Z})\cong C(\beta\mathbb{Z})$) one notices that every automorphism must permute the minimal projections of $\ell^\infty(\mathbb{Z})$ which are in one-to-one correspondence with $\mathbb{Z}$ $\endgroup$ May 3, 2016 at 1:20
  • $\begingroup$ @CalebEckhardt: that is nicer. On the other hand, identifying with $C(\beta\mathbb{Z})$ allows us to invoke the Banach-Stone theorem and say that every linear isometry of $l^\infty(\mathbb{Z})$ with itself has this form. $\endgroup$
    – Nik Weaver
    May 6, 2016 at 1:35
  • $\begingroup$ @CalebEckhardt, you're argument seems to suggest that every isometry of $\ell^\infty$ would come from a permutation, which is incorrect: take the multiplication map with a function $\mathbb{Z}\to\{-1,1\}$ (or to $S^1$ over $\mathbb{C}$). $\endgroup$
    – Uri Bader
    May 6, 2016 at 6:08
7
$\begingroup$

Yes, the group of automorphisms of $\ell^\infty(\mathbb{Z})$ preserving the $W^*$-algebra structure is the group of permutations of $\mathbb{Z}$.

On the one hand, any permutation of $\mathbb{Z}$ acts as an automorphism of $\ell^\infty(\mathbb{Z})$.

On the other hand, any $W^*$-algebra automorphism of $\ell^\infty(\mathbb{Z})$ sends characters - that is, homomorphisms $\chi: \ell^\infty(\mathbb{Z}) \to \mathbb{C}$ - to characters, so it defines a permutation of the characters. By the Gelfand-Naimark correspondence, there is a compact Hausdorff space $\beta\mathbb{Z}$ called the Stone-Cech compactification of $\mathbb{Z}$ such that

$$\ell^\infty(\mathbb{Z}) \cong C(\beta\mathbb{Z}) $$

Points of $\beta\mathbb{Z}$ are the same as characters $\chi: \ell^\infty(\mathbb{Z}) \to \mathbb{C}$. Every point $n \in \mathbb{Z}$ defines a character $\chi$ by

$$ \chi(f) = f(n) $$

Not all characters are of this form, as pointed out by Yemon Choi and Uri Bader. However, the weak-$\ast$-continuous characters are. If $\alpha$ is a $W^*$-algebra automorphism of $\ell^\infty(\mathbb{Z})$ and $\chi$ is a weak-$\ast$-continuous character, $\chi \circ \alpha$ is again weak-$\ast$-continuous. So, every $W^*$-algebra automorphism of $\ell^\infty(\mathbb{Z})$ defines a permutation of the integers.

The concept of 'weak-$\ast$-continuous character' is a bit fancy, so I like Nik Weaver's simpler argument below. Just as the integers give the weak-$\ast$-continuous characters on $\ell^\infty(\mathbb{Z})$, they give the isolated points in $\beta\mathbb{Z}$ - but this is easier to understand, and easier to prove. By the functorality of the Gelfand-Naimark correspondence any automorphism of $\ell^\infty(\mathbb{Z})$ comes from a homeomorphism of $\beta\mathbb{Z}$, and these clearly map isolated points to isolated points. So, any automorphism of $\ell^\infty(\mathbb{Z})$ gives a permutation of the integers.

$\endgroup$
3
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ In the Cstar context, the characters of $\ell^\infty({\bf Z})$ are NOT all given by evaluation at integers -- rather, they correspond to points of the Stone-Cech compactification. I suspect that in your second paragraph you want to restrict attention to weak-star continuous characters, which are all of the form you state. $\endgroup$
    – Yemon Choi
    May 2, 2016 at 4:51
  • $\begingroup$ Indeed, characters supported on the boundary of $\mathbb{Z}$ in the Stone Ceck compactification will not be weak* continuous. $\endgroup$
    – Uri Bader
    May 2, 2016 at 5:57
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks, you're right of course! Let me fix my answer just to avoid confusion. $\endgroup$
    – John Baez
    May 5, 2016 at 18:19
2
$\begingroup$

For a standard Lebesgue space $(X,\mu)$ the autmorphism group of the W* algebra $L^\infty(X,\mu)$ is the group of measure class preserving automorphisms of $(X,\mu)$ - the group of a.e defined measurable map $\sigma:X\to X$ s.t $\sigma_*\mu$ and $\mu$ are equivalent, modulo the relation of being identical a.e. (more generally: the category of standard Lebesgue spaces and (the op of) the category of commutative W* algebras with separable predual are equivalent).

Apply this general fact in the case $(\mathbb{Z},\text{counting})$ and get the answer: yes, every automorphism is given by a permutation.

$\endgroup$
4
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ More specifically: every C*-algebra automorphism will come from a self homeo of $\beta\mathbb{Z}$. Those which are weak* cont. will preserve the measure class induced by the predual $\ell^1(\mathbb{Z})$, which is supported on $\mathbb{Z}$. Hence this part will be preserved. Since it is dense, the homeo will be defined uniquely by its restriction to $\mathbb{Z}$. $\endgroup$
    – Uri Bader
    May 2, 2016 at 6:07
  • $\begingroup$ Here is another way to see it: every auto of $\ell^{\infty}$ gives an isometry of the unique predual $\ell^1$. Now use Banach-Lamperti which classifies these, and check which dual isometry of these preserves the algebra structure on $\ell^\infty$. $\endgroup$
    – Uri Bader
    May 2, 2016 at 6:25
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Again, it is a general fact that any C*-automorphism of a von Neumann algebra is automatically weak* continuous. $\endgroup$
    – Nik Weaver
    May 2, 2016 at 11:57
  • $\begingroup$ @NikWeaver sure, you are right and in fact it is too esay to see it here: $\mathbb{Z}$ consists of the isolated points in $\beta\mathbb{Z}$... $\endgroup$
    – Uri Bader
    May 2, 2016 at 13:23

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.