3

2

Let $N$ be a normal subgroup of $G \times H$, and let $\pi_1: G \times H \to G$ and $\pi_2: G \times H \to H$ be the canonical projections. Then $\pi_1(N)$ is normal in $G$ and $\pi_2(N)$ is normal in $H$. What else can we say? I know that it is not true, in general, that $N \simeq \pi_1(N) \times \pi_2(N)$.

I'm particularly interested in the case where $G$ and $H$ are simple. In that case, $N \simeq \pi_1(N) \times \pi_2(N)$ except possibly in the case where $\pi_1(N) = G$ and $\pi_2(N) = H$. In that case, what do we know?

flag

4 Answers

9

See Goursat's lemma.

link|flag
Perfect! So in particular, if I understand correctly, if $G$ and $H$ are distinct simple groups, then it is true that for a normal subgroup $N$, $N \simeq \pi_1(N) \times \pi_2(N)$. – Gabe Cunningham May 6 2010 at 13:00
2 
Wow, I never knew this had a name. – HW May 6 2010 at 17:32
3

Let $N$ be normal in $G\times H$. For $n=(n_1, n_2) \in N$ and $(g, 1) \in G\times H$ follows $([n_1, g], 1) = (n_1^{-1}n_1^g, 1) = n^{-1}\cdot n^{(g, 1)} \in N$ (taking the notations used in group theory: $n^g = g^{-1}ng$ etc), i.e., $[\pi_1(N), G]\times 1 \le N$ (where $[A, B]$ denotes the subgroup generated by the commutators $[a, b]$ with $a \in A, b\in B$). Also $1\times[\pi_2(N), H] \le N$, hence $[\pi_1(N), G]\times[\pi_2(N), H] \le N$.

As $[\pi_1(N), G]$ is normal in $G$, one can easily deduce for $G, H$ simple the cases described by Jack Schmidt (and also what happens in the missing case that one of the two groups is abelian but the other one not).

link|flag
Thanks, fixed the missing case. – Jack Schmidt May 6 2010 at 14:38
3

If G and H are non-abelian simple groups and N is a normal subgroup of G×H, then N is equal (not just isomorphic) to 1×1, 1×H, G×1, or G×H. If G and H are simple groups but not isomorphic, then the same is true. If G and H are isomorphic abelian simple groups, then G×H is a two-dimensional vector space over some Z/pZ, and so it has 1 + (p+1) + 1 normal subgroups, 1 of dimension 0, p+1 of dimension 1, and 1 of dimension 2. Only in the last case can it happen that N is not precisely equal to (and also not isomorphic to) π1(N)×π2(N), but of course this happens for p-1 of the 1-dimensional subspaces, the ones that have non-trivial projection onto both the x and y axes.

link|flag
0

You can certainly have other situations, even in the simple case. For instance if $G$ and $H$ are isomorphic, the diagonal maps onto each factor.

link|flag
See Goursat's lemma ;-) – Kevin Buzzard May 6 2010 at 12:45
1 
The diagonal's very rarely normal! – HW May 6 2010 at 17:31

Your Answer

Get an OpenID
or

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.