MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I need this for a counterexample: the multiplication in the fundamental group $\pi_1(\Sigma X_+)$, when it is equipped with the topology inherited from $\Omega \Sigma X_+$, fails to be continuous for the sort of space in the question, by a result from

J. Brazas, The topological fundamental group and hoop earring spaces, 2009, arXiv:0910.3685

but the author doesn't supply an explicit example of such a space.

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 6 down vote accepted

One of the easiest examples is the rational numbers with the subspace topology of the real line with the K-topology. Total path disconnectedness is not entirely necessary for multiplication of $\pi_{1}(\Sigma X_{+})$ to fail to be continuous. It just makes the path component space of $X$ equal to $X$, greatly simplifying complications.

share|cite|improve this answer
Thanks, Jeremy! I knew it would be something relatively simple, but I have little intuition for point-set topology. If we drop total path disconnectedness, what do we have to assume? – David Roberts May 4 '10 at 22:22 have to know something about the path component space $\pi_{0}^{top}(X)$ (the quotient of $X$ where path components are identified). It is good enough to know that $\pi_{0}^{top}(X)$ is Hausdorff but not completely regular to be sure that $\pi_{1}^{top}(\Sigma X_+)$ is not a topological group. Since $\pi_{0}^{top}$ is essentially surjective this gives a counterexample for every Hausdorff, non-completely regular space. There are much better examples (locally simply connected metric spaces even!) which would probably be more interesting. These will appear in a new version soon. – Jeremy Brazas May 6 '10 at 12:49

There are several such examples in Steen and Seebach, Counterexamples in Topology. The first one I saw is number 60, the "relatively prime integer topology", consisting of the set $\mathbb{Z}^+$ of positive integers, with a basis of sets of the form {b + na} where (a,b)=1 and n is an integer.

share|cite|improve this answer
Should we make this a rule? Before asking for a counterexample in topology, you should consult the book COUNTEREXAMPLES IN TOPOLOGY. – Gerald Edgar May 4 '10 at 15:42
If the book were freely available on the internet, this would seem reasonable. But it isn't, is it? – Pete L. Clark May 4 '10 at 22:11
It's not freely available on the internet, to my knowledge, but, being a Dover book, it is available on the internet for very cheap:… – Keenan Kidwell May 5 '10 at 0:45
@PeteL.Clark A searchable database based on Counterexamples is available for free online: – Austin Mohr Apr 22 '14 at 21:25
@Austin: great! – Pete L. Clark Apr 24 '14 at 17:15

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.