MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

This might turn out to be a silly question, but here goes.

Let $\mathcal{C}$ be a full additive subcategory of an abelian category $\mathcal{A}$. I'm wondering if the Grothendieck group $K(\mathcal{C})$ (defined below) depends on $\mathcal{A}$. I can't think of any examples, and I believe that it does not. Something with Yoneda embeddings (see Weibel) comes to mind, but I can't really get it precise.

Idea. Given two embeddings $\mathcal{C}\subset\mathcal{A}_1$ and $\mathcal{C}\subset \mathcal{A}_2$, I'm guessing it suffices to find a third one containing these.

Def. Let $\textrm{Ob}(\mathcal{C})$ denote the class of objects in $\mathcal{C}$ and let $\textrm{Ob}(\mathcal{C})/\cong$ be the set of isomorphism classes. Let $F(\mathcal{C})$ be the free abelian group on $\textrm{Ob}(\mathcal{C})/\cong$. To any sequence $$(E) \ \ 0 \longrightarrow M^\prime \longrightarrow M \longrightarrow M^{\prime\prime} \longrightarrow 0 .$$ in $\mathcal{C}$, which is exact in $\mathcal{A}$, we associate the element $Q(E) = [M] - [M^\prime] - [M^{\prime\prime}]$ in $F(\mathcal{C})$. Let $H(\mathcal{C})$ be the subgroup generated by the elements $Q(E)$, where $E$ is a short exact sequence. We define the Grothendieck group, denoted by $K(\mathcal{C})$, as the quotient group $$K(\mathcal{C}) = F(\mathcal{C})/H(\mathcal{C}).$$

(All categories are assumed to be at least skeletally small in this definition, but ok.)

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 10 down vote accepted

I think that the Grothendieck group DOES depend on A. Indeed, any additive category C could be embedded (by the Yoneda embedding) into the abelian category of contravariant additive functors from C to abelian groups (some call this category the category of presheaves on C). For this embedding the only exact sequence of objects coming from C are those that are given by decompositions of direct sums (in C). On the other hand, you can take for C an arbitrary additive subcategory of an abelian A where there could be tons of (non-trivial) exact sequences.

share|cite|improve this answer

The abelian category $\mathcal A$ is inducing extra structure on $\mathcal C$, namely, it singles out a certain class of short exact sequences in $\mathcal C$ (namely the sequences that are short exact in $\mathcal A$), which (under additional mild assumptions) give $\mathcal C$ the structure of an exact category. The $K_0$ is then an invariant of the exact category (i.e. $\mathcal C$ together with this chosen class of exact sequences).

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.