MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let $(M,[\theta])$ be a contact manifold, $\dim M=2n+1$, and denote by $\mathcal{I}^\theta$ the differential ideal generated by the contact form $\theta$.

An exterior differential system on $M$ of the form $$ (M,\mathcal{I}^\theta+\mathcal{I}) $$ can be called a contact EDS on $M$.

A contact EDS on $M$ is naturally interpreted as a PDE imposed on Legendrian submanifolds of $M$: in local contact coordinates, a Legendrian (i.e., $\mathcal{I}^\theta$-integral and $n$-dimensional) submanifold is the graph of the first jet of a function $u$ in $n$ independent variables, and the condition of being also $\mathcal{I}$-integral reads as a second-order PDE on $u$. For instance, if $\mathcal{I}$ is generated by an $n$-form, then one gets a Monge-Ampere equation. (If $\mathcal{I}=0$ one gets the trivial PDE $0=0$, whose solutions are all the Legrendrian submanifolds.)

QUESTION: what is the class of $n$-dimensional scalar second-order PDEs which corresponds to contact EDS on $(2n+1)$-dimensional contact manifolds? Is it larger than the class of Monge-Ampere equations, or not?

I'm really curious, provided that "my" definition of contact EDS above is correct, where it can be found in the literature. (The sum $\mathcal{I}^\theta+\mathcal{I}$ is just a fancy way to say that I'm taking an ideal containing the contact ideal.)

share|cite|improve this question

If one wants the ideal to represent a single second-order PDE on a single unknown function of $n$ variables well-defined up to contact transformations, then the ideal should just be $\mathcal{I}^\theta$ with a single $\mathcal{I}^\theta$-primitive $n$-form $\Upsilon$ adjoined (i.e., a Monge-Ampère system). However, one can have larger ideals than this that represent systems of second-order PDE on a single unknown function of $n$ variables. (These can be either involutive or not.)

One way to see this is to consider any hypersurface $\Sigma$ in the space $\mathcal{V}_n(\mathcal{I}^\theta)$ (which is a smooth manifold of dimension $\tfrac12(n^2{+}5n{+}2)$). You can ask when $\Sigma$ is the space of integral elements of some ideal $\mathcal{J}$ on $M^{2n+1}$, and one finds that this happens if and only if $\mathcal{J}$ is a Monge-Ampère system.

As for involutive second-order systems that contain the contact ideal, there are many (too many to classify).

share|cite|improve this answer
    
I see: you regard $\mathcal{V}_n(\mathcal{I}^\theta)$ as a bundle over $M$ and, since its fibre at $x\in M$ is the Lagrangian Grassmannian of the $2n$-dimensional space $\ker\theta_x$, which has dimension $\frac{1}{2}(n^2+n)$, you get $\frac{1}{2}(n^2+5n+2)=\frac{1}{2}(n^2+n)+(2n+1)$ overall. Now we have a one-codimensional sub-bundle $\Sigma$, and we wish to show that, if $\Sigma$ is the space of the integral elements of some ideal, then, fibre by fibre, $\Sigma_x$ is an hyperplane section of the Lagrangian Grassmannian (i.e. a Monge-Ampere equation): no idea how to do that - is it classical? – Giovanni Moreno Mar 1 at 14:28
    
@GiovanniMoreno: Yes, it's essentially classical. The point is that the Lagrangian Grassmannian in $\ker(\theta_x)$ is the intersection of the full Grassmannian with the space of $\mathrm{d}\theta_x$-primitive $n$-vectors in $\ker(\theta_x)$ at each point $x\in M$. Its hyperplane sections are then given by the $\mathrm{d}\theta_x$-primitive $n$-forms in $\ker(\theta_x)^\ast$, which follows from a dimension count, once you know the dimension of this space, which is a classical fact from symplectic linear algebra. – Robert Bryant Mar 1 at 14:57
1  
@GiovanniMoreno: (continued). Further, it follows from symplectic linear algebra that, if there is a $k$-form $\psi$ that is not contained in $\mathcal{I}^\theta$ then $k\le n$ and, if $k < n$, then there exists an $(n{-}k)$-form $\phi$ such that $\psi\wedge\phi$ is an $n$-form that is not contained in $\mathcal{I}^\theta$. This shows that any ideal $\mathcal{J}$ that properly contains $\mathcal{I}^\theta$ must contain a nonzero $\mathrm{d}\theta$-primitive $n$-form, implying that the integral elements of $\mathcal{J}$ must lie in a hyperplane section of the Lagrangian Grassmannian. – Robert Bryant Mar 1 at 17:37

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.