MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let $G_1$ and $G_2$ be the groups with the following presentations:

$$G_1=\langle a,b \;|\; (ab)^2=a^{-1}ba^{-1}, (a^{-1}ba^{-1})^2=b^{-2}a, (ba^{-1})^2=a^{-2}b^2 \rangle,$$

$$G_2=\langle a,b \;|\; ab=(a^{-1}ba^{-1})^2, (b^{-1}ab^{-1})^2=a^{-2}b, (ba^{-1})^2=a^{-2}b^2 \rangle,$$

Are these groups torsion-free?

Motivation: In both of these groups $1+a+b$ as an element of the group algebra $\mathbb{F}_2[G_i]$ over the field with two elements is a zero divisor. Thus one has a counterexample for the Kaplansky zero divisor conjecture if one of $G_i$s is torsion-free!


$$(1+a+b)(aba^{-1}ba^{-1}+a^{-1}b^2a^{-1}ba^{-1}+a^{-1}ba^{-1}+b^{-1}a^{-1}+b^{-1}a^{-2}ba^{-1}+ab+1+ba^{-1}ba^{-1}+baba^{-1}ba^{-1}+b+bab+a^{-2 }ba^{-1}+a^{-1}+b^{-1}a)=0$$

share|cite|improve this question
What is the zero divisor-mate of 1+a+b? – Ali Taghavi Feb 23 at 14:09
What is the structure of $G/G'$? Is it torsion free? – Ali Taghavi Feb 23 at 14:17
@AliTaghavi. I will shortly write the mates. Those are of length 14. – Alireza Abdollahi Feb 23 at 14:35
The computation of abelianization is an immediate computation (if I'm correct it's $Z\times Z/11Z$ for the first and $Z\times Z/21Z$ for the second), but I don't think it helps much. – YCor Feb 23 at 14:52
I am not aware of any algorithmic methods for attempting to verify that a group defined by a finite presentation is torsion-free (unless the group can be proved to be nilpotent). I would be interested to learn about it if there are any, even if they only work in restricted circumstances. – Derek Holt Feb 23 at 15:29
up vote 28 down vote accepted

Denote $x=ab$, $y=a^{-1}ba^{-1}$. Then the first two relations of the first group are $x^2=y$, $y^2=(yx)^{-1}$. This implies $x^4=x^{-3}$ or $x^7=1$. So the group has torsion. I leave the second group as an exercise for the others.

share|cite|improve this answer
Excellent! Of course you also need to show that $x \ne 1$, which could be difficult in general, but fortunately its image in $G/[G,G]$ is nontrivial. – Derek Holt Feb 23 at 18:09

Similar to the answer of Mark Sapir, for the second group let $x=ba$ and $y=b^{-1}ab^{-1}$. From the second relation we have $y^2=x^{-1}y^{-1}$. So, from the first relation we have $x=y^4$. These relations implies that $y^4=y^{-3}$ or $y^7=1$.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.