MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Gabber's purity theorem is the statement that if $\mathscr{F}$ is a pure perverse sheaf on an open subvariety $j : U \hookrightarrow X$ then so is $j_{!*} \mathscr{F}$.

It is remarkable because it gives many objects besides (pure) local systems on smooth varieties for which purity and the Weil conjectures hold.

It is proved in $\S$5 of Faisceaux pervers by BBD(G). Here the proof is quite natural once one accepts deep theorems of Deligne: $j_{!*} \mathscr{F}$ occurs as the image of a map between an object with weights $\le m$ and an object with weights $\ge m$ and hence has weights $\{ \ge m \} \cap \{ \le m \} = \{ m \}$.

However I understand that Gabber found another proof earlier. Is this the case? Or is it similar to the one given by [BBD(G)]?

Gabber's work is often cited as:

[Ga1] O. Gabber : Pureté de la cohomologie de MacPherson-Goresky rédigé par P. Deligne, prépublication I.H.E.S., 1981

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 21 down vote accepted

It's different, but it also uses Weil II. See Purity for intersection cohomology after Deligne-Gabber for my translation of the original.

share|cite|improve this answer
1  
Thank you very much! I wish I had more than one up vote :) – Geordie Williamson Feb 16 at 11:32

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.