MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

As the question title suggests, what is a Futaki invariant, what is the intuition behind it, and why is it important?

share|cite|improve this question

The best reference is the nice survey paper of Tian about Futaki invariant and CM polarization and another paper of Tian with Ding

The Futaki invariant is a Lie algebra character on the space of holomorphic vector fields. Its vanishing is a necessary (but not sufficient) condition for the existence of a Kahler-Einstein metric on Fano varieties. The Futaki invariant is related to the Chow weight in GIT. In fact, on any Fano variety, we have an obstruction to finding a Kaehler-Einstein metric: if the Futaki invariant doesn't vanishes then there is no Kahler Einstein metric.

Donaldson generalized the Futaki invariant; his generalization is known as the Donaldson-Futaki invariant. It can be rewritten as a CM-line bundle due to Tian.

It is worth mentioning that for arithmetic varieties, the Donaldson-Tian-Futaki invariant is a generalized version of the Faltings height. See

Let $(X,L)$ be a polarized projective variety. Given an ample line bundle $L\to X$, then a test configuration for the pair $(X,L)$ consists of:

  • a scheme $\mathfrak X$ with a $\mathbb C^*$-action
  • a flat $\mathbb C^*$-equivariant map $\pi:\mathfrak X\to \mathbb C$ with fibres $X_t$;
  • an equivariant line bundle $\mathfrak L\to \mathfrak X$, ample on all fibres;
  • for some $r>0$, an isomorphism of the pair $(\mathfrak X_1, \mathfrak L_1)$ with the original pair $(X,L^r)$.

Let $U_k=H^0(\mathfrak X_0,\mathfrak L_0^k\mid_{\mathfrak X_1})$ be vector spaces with $\mathbb C^*$-action, and let $A_k \colon U_k\to U_k$ be the endomorphisms generating those actions. Then

$$\operatorname{dim} U_k=a_0k^n+a_1k^{n-1}+\dots$$


Then the Donaldson-Futaki invariant of a test configuration $(\mathfrak X,\mathfrak L)$ is

$$Fut(\mathfrak X,\mathfrak L)=\frac{2(a_1b_0-a_0b_1)}{a_0}.$$


for more information

Moreover, if you use the notion of slope stability of holomorphic vector bundles and use CM bundle of Tian then you see how the Futaki Donaldson invariant appear ;)

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.