# convex hull of finite set is compact [closed]

In a Banach space, is the convex hull of finite set compact?

-

## closed as too localized by George Lowther, Matthew Daws, Andreas Blass, Bill Johnson, Alain ValetteNov 4 '11 at 15:26

This question is unlikely to help any future visitors; it is only relevant to a small geographic area, a specific moment in time, or an extraordinarily narrow situation that is not generally applicable to the worldwide audience of the internet. For help making this question more broadly applicable, visit the help center. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

The convex hull of a set of $n$ points is the image of the $n$-simplex in $\mathbb R^n$ under a continuous function, so yes. –  Mariano Suárez-Alvarez Apr 26 '10 at 5:46
Mariano: do you want to write this as an answer (community wiki if you wish) so I can vote it up? I think it's slightly more to the point than Pete's answer (no offence, Pete!) which works fine but I think is slightly over-elaborate. To be fair, the same idea underlies both. –  Yemon Choi Apr 26 '10 at 8:05
I am also not keen on questions which give little to no indication of (a) why the questioner wants to know (b) what they've tried doing (c) what level they are at. –  Yemon Choi Apr 26 '10 at 8:06
@Yemon: I agree so much that I deleted my answer. –  Pete L. Clark Apr 26 '10 at 16:58

Suppose $X$ is your Banach space and let $\{x_1,\dots,x_n\}$ be a finite subset of $X$. Let $$S=\{(t_1,\dots,t_n)\in\mathbb R^n:t_1,\dots,t_n\geq0,\\,t_1+\cdots+t_n=1\}$$ be the standard simplex in $\mathbb R^n$. The map $$\phi:(t_1,\dots,t_n)\in S\mapsto t_1x_1+\cdots+t_nx_n\in X$$ is evindently continuous and its image is $\mathrm{conv}\{x_1,\dots,x_n\}$. Since $S$ is compact, so is $\mathrm{conv}\{x_1,\dots,x_n\}$.

-
Just to make perfectly clear what is used in the proof: $\phi$ is continuous because $X$ is a topological vector space and $S$ is compact as $X$ is a separated space. –  Torsten Ekedahl Apr 26 '10 at 15:46
$S$ is compact because it is closed and bounded in $\mathbb R^n$, rather! :) –  Mariano Suárez-Alvarez Apr 26 '10 at 15:48
Sorry, misread I thought $S$ was the image. –  Torsten Ekedahl Apr 26 '10 at 16:48

Of course yes: the n points lie in the finite-dimentional linear subspace generated by themselves (remember that any norm, when restricted to a finite-dimensional linear subspace, gives rise to the same topology on that space).

-

Actually, the convex hull of a sequence of points $(x_n)$ is (relatively) compact when $x_n\rightarrow 0$, and this easily gives a positive answer to your question (but is somewhat overkill). In fact, a closed convex set K in a Banach space is compact if and only if it's contained in the closed convex hull of a sequence $(x_n)$ with $x_n\rightarrow 0$. See, for example, Lindenstrauss and Tazfriri, vol I, Proposition 1.e.2.

-
Actually, the statement in the question holds for all topological vector spaces, not just Banach spaces. The generalisation here does not apply so widely. I think you need local convexity. –  George Lowther Nov 4 '11 at 12:21