MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let F be a function field, and A its adele ring. I want to consider U(A)/U(F), where U(A) is the space of strictly upper triangular matrices with entries from A, and U(F) is the same with entries from F. I was wondering anyone has an idea or a source that proves this space is compact so that we get a finite measure.

share|cite|improve this question
Isn't such a group a repeated extension of copies of the adele class group (which is compact)? – Pete L. Clark Apr 15 '10 at 18:23
If $G$ is any solvable smooth connected affine gp over global $F$ and has no nontrivial $F$-rat'l character (e.g., unip.) then $G(A)/G(F)$ is compact. Over number fields, due to Godement. Argument generalized to function fields by Oesterle; see Thm 1.3 in Ch. IV of Oesterle's Inv. paper on Tamagawa numbers. For case you ask about, just use comp. series with successive qts as vector gps, and lots of Hilb. 90 for exactness on adelic, local, global pts. In fact, for any smooth conn'd affine $G$ over $F$ with no nontriv $F$-rat'l characters, $G(A)/G(F)$ has finite vol; lies deeper in char > 0. – BCnrd Apr 15 '10 at 18:31
@Brian: I know that in general there are more unipotent groups in positive characteristic, e.g. Witt vector groups. But do they arise in this case? – Pete L. Clark Apr 15 '10 at 18:33
@Pete: Even Witt groups have filtration by copies of the additive group, so there are far worse unipotent groups out there (over imperfect fields). That said, they don't arise for the question as posed, for the reason mentioned in your first comment and mine (I have the bad habit to say "Hilbert 90" for the additive version too, which I suppose must have another name.) – BCnrd Apr 15 '10 at 19:22
@Brian: right, there's this "k-wound" nastiness that I read about in BLR. (That's why I said e.g.) Thanks for your response. – Pete L. Clark Apr 15 '10 at 19:25

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.