1
$\begingroup$

Let $X$ be a compact Hausdorff space. A continuous map $f:X \to X$ defines a bounded linear operator $T_{f}$ on the Banach space $C(X)=\{\phi:X\to \mathbb{C} \mid \phi\; \text{is continuous}\}$ with $T_{f}(\phi)=\phi \circ f$.

Put $X=[0,1]$.

What is an example of a non constant map $f$ such that $T_{f}$ is a compact operator? What is an example of a map $f$ such that $T_{f}$ is a Fredholm operator of non-zero index?

For a linked MSE question see this MSE post.

$\endgroup$
4
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ It is easy to check that $T_f$ is compact iff it has finite rank iff $f[X}$ is a finite set. For the not completely obvious implication, compose $T_f$ with the restriction mapping $R$ from $C(X)$ to $C(f[X])$. The composition $RT_f$ is a quotient map by Tietze, and $C(f[X])$ is infinite dimensional if $f[X}$ is infinite. In particular, if $X$ is connected then $T_f$ is not compact unless $f$ is constant. As for your second question, let $X$ be the range of a sequence of distinct points together with its limit and let $f$ act as a shift. $\endgroup$ Jul 23, 2015 at 15:04
  • $\begingroup$ @BillJohnson Prof. Johnson Thank you for your very interesting comment. My second question is about X=interval. $\endgroup$ Jul 23, 2015 at 15:38
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The only way for $T_f$ to be Fredholm when $X=[0,1]$ is for it to be a surjective homeomorphism. If $f$ is not surjective, then $T_f(\phi)=0$ when every $\phi$ is supported off of the interval $f[0,1]$. If $f$ is not $1-1$, then there are infinitely many pairs $(a,b)$ of distinct points s.t. $f(a)=f(b)$, which implies that $T_f$ cannot have finite codimensional range. $\endgroup$ Jul 23, 2015 at 18:58
  • $\begingroup$ @BillJohnson Does this 1-1 argument works if we replace the interval by a compact manifold M? If yes, we would obtain an alternative proof for the fact that the spase of homeomorphisms of a compact manifold is an open set(As it is proved in Hircsh Diff. topology). This would be a consequence of openness of fredholm operatores. So is it obvious that for a non 1-1 map f on M there are infinite pairs (a,b) with f(a)=f(b)? $\endgroup$ Jul 24, 2015 at 18:53

1 Answer 1

6
$\begingroup$

The image of $f$ is an interval $[a,b] \subset [0,1]$.

$T_f$ induce an isometric inclusion of $C([a,b])$ in $C([0,1])$.

If $T_f$ was compact then weak convergence of a bounded sequence in $C([a,b])$ would imply norm convergence in $C([0,1])$ which would in turn (as $T_f$ is isometric) imply norm convergence in $C([a,b])$. which is only possible if $C([a,b])$ is finite dimensional i.e. if $f$ is constant.

(edit: $C([a,b])$ is embeded in $C([0,1])$ by extending the functions by their value on the boundary outside $[a,b]$ and I'm identifying $T_f$ with its restriction to $C([a,b])$, which is also compact...)

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.