1
$\begingroup$

Consider a short exact sequence of partially ordered groups $$0 \longrightarrow H \stackrel{\alpha}{\longrightarrow} G \stackrel{\beta} {\longrightarrow} G/H \longrightarrow 0 ,$$ where $H$ is a convex subgroups of $G.$ In content of ordered groups how do we define the spliting condition of this sequence? Suppose if this sequnce splits, then there exists a homomorphism $\gamma : G/H \rightarrow G$ such that $\beta\circ\gamma$ is identity on $G/H.$ Do we need $\gamma$ is an order homomorphism?

$\endgroup$
3
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ It depends what you actually want. In Abelian categories, the fact of having a $\gamma$ which is right inverse to $\beta$, tells you that $G=H\oplus G/H$. On the other hand, in general categories that condition just tells you that $G/H$ is a retract of $G$, but not a summand. Of course, in any case, you want $\gamma$ to be a morphism in your category, so in this case you want it to be an order homomorphism but, the mere existence of such $\gamma$ may not imply the splitting. $\endgroup$ Jul 8, 2015 at 8:19
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Also, are you considering just Abelian groups, or arbitrary group? $\endgroup$ Jul 8, 2015 at 8:21
  • $\begingroup$ @Thank you Simone Virili. Here I am considering the groups are abelian and torsion free and partially ordered. $\endgroup$
    – Rajnish
    Jul 8, 2015 at 8:43

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

Let $G$ be a (Abelian) po-group and remember that the partial order is completely determined by the positive cone $G^+=\{g\in G:g\geq 0\}$. Furthermore, a subset $P\subseteq G$ is a positive cone if and only if it has the following properties:

-- $0 \in P$;

-- if $a \in P$ and $b \in P$, then $a+b \in P$;

-- if $a \in P$ and $-a \in P$ then $a=0$.

Now, given a subgroup $H$ of $G$, $H$ is a subobject of $G$ if and only if $H^+=G^+\cap H$. On the other hand, in the category of po-groups, kernels of morphisms and subobjects are two different concepts as, if we want $H$ to be a kernel, then we need also to assume that it is convex in $G$, that is, if $h_1\leq g\leq h_2$ for $h_1,h_2\in H$ and $g\in G$, then $g\in H$.

Now, in the question (and comments), it seems to be asked about torsion-free Abelian groups, the torsion free hypothesis adds one more difficulty, as the kernels in such category are the pure subgroups. Thus, to start with the answer we need to assume that $H$ is a pure, convex subgroup of $G$, whose order is just the restriction of that of $G$. In this case, $G/H$ is a torsion free Abelian po-group when we take as positive cone $(G/H)^+=\{g+H:g\in G^+\}$.

Let me also recall that, in the category of po-groups, the coproduct of two po-groups $(G_1, G_1^+)$ and $(G_2,G_2^+)$ is given by $(G_1\oplus G_2, G_1^+\oplus G_2^+)$.

Now, in the setting of the question, even if $\alpha$ is a pure monomorphism, and there exists an ordered homomorphism $\gamma:G/H\to G$ such that $\beta\gamma=id_{G/H}$ we just obtain that $G\cong H\oplus G/H$ as abstract groups because there is a priori no reason for $G$ to split as a po-group. To ensure this stronger splitting one need to check that $G^+=\alpha(H^+)\oplus \gamma((G/H)^+)$.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ @ Simone Virili. This makes sense for me. Now I got what I was looking. Thank you so much. I think $G^{+} = \alpha(H^{+})$ \oplus \gamma((G/H)+) holds if we assume the original sequence is order exact. That is $\alpha(H^{+}) = \alpha(H)\cap G^{+}$ and $\beta(G^{+}) = (G/H)^{+}.$ $\endgroup$
    – Rajnish
    Jul 10, 2015 at 17:08

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.