5
$\begingroup$

Let $K$ be a number field and $A/K$ an abelian variety over it.

Can it be that $K(A[n])$ does not contain a primitive $n$-th rooth of unity?

If the answer is yes is it always possible to bound the bad $n$ uniformly in the degree of the number field and the dimension of $A$?

Both references and arguments are well appreciated! Thanks in advance

$\endgroup$

2 Answers 2

16
$\begingroup$

Actually, this is an exercise in Serre's Lectures on Mordell--Weil Theorem:

$K(A[n])$ always contains $\mu_n$ if $char(K)$ does not divide $n$ and $A$ is an abelian variety of positive dimension over $K$. (You don't need to assume that $K$ is a number field)

Here is a solution. First, it suffices to check the case when $n=\ell^m$ is a power of a prime $\ell$.

Second, if $A^t$ is the dual of $A$ then let us take a $K$-polarization $\lambda: A \to A^{t}$ of smallest possible degree. Then $\lambda$ is not divisible by $\ell$, i.e., $\ker(\lambda)$ does not contain the whole $A[\ell]$. (Otherwise, dividing $\lambda$ by $\ell$ we get a $K$-polarization of lesser degree.)

Then the image $\lambda(A[\ell^m])\subset A^t[\ell^m]$ contains a point of exact order $\ell^m$, say $Q$. Otherwise, $$\lambda(A[\ell^m])\subset A^t[\ell^{m-1}]$$ and therefore $A[\ell]=\ell^{m-1}A[\ell^m]$ lies in the kernel of $\lambda$, which is not the case.

Since $A[\ell^m]\subset A[K]$ and $\lambda$ is defined over $K$, the image $\lambda(A[\ell^m])$ lies in $A^t(K)$. In particular, $Q$ is a $K$-rational point on $A^t$.

Third, there is a nondegenerate Galois-equivariant Weil pairing $$e_n: A[\ell^m] \times A^t[\ell^m] \to \mu_{\ell^m}.$$ I claim that there is a point $P \in A[\ell^m]$ such that $e_n(P,Q)$ is a primitive $\ell^m$th root of unity. Indeed, otherwise $$e_n(A[\ell^m],Q) \subset \mu_{\ell^{m-1}}$$ and therefore nonzero $\ell^{m-1}Q$ is orthogonal to the whole $A[\ell^m]$ with respect to $e_n$, which contradicts the nondegeneracy of $e_n$.

So, $$\gamma:=e_n(P,Q)$$ is a primitive $\ell^m$th root of unity that lies in $K$, because both $P$ and $Q$ are $K$-points. Since cyclic $\mu_{\ell^m}$ is generated by $\gamma$, $$\mu_{\ell^m}\subset K.$$

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ It seems that one can also combine Joe Silverman's answer with your observation that $A^4$ has a principal polarization. $\endgroup$
    – ACL
    Jul 1, 2015 at 8:42
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Actually, $A^4$ does not have to be principally polarized. In fact, it does not have to be isomorphic to its dual. (As an example, you may take an abelian surface $A$ over an algebraically closed field $K$ with $\End(A)=\Z$ and such that $\Hom(A,A^t)$ is generated by the polarization $\lambda: A \to A^t$ with $\ker(\lambda)$ being a product of two cyclic groups of prime order $\ell \ne char(K)$.) It is $(A \times A^t)^4$, which is always principally polarized. $\endgroup$ Jul 1, 2015 at 12:39
  • $\begingroup$ My mistake! Sorry for the confusion and thank you for your answer and your reply to my comment. $\endgroup$
    – ACL
    Jul 2, 2015 at 9:15
8
$\begingroup$

Let $\hat A/K$ be the dual of $A/K$. Then $K(A[n],\hat A[n])$ contains a primitive $n$'th root of unity, since it contains the image of the Weil pairing $e_n:A[n]\times\hat A[n]\to\mu_n$, which is non-degenerate. So if $A/K$ has a principal polarization (i.e., defined over $K$), then $A\cong_K\hat A$, and hence $K(A[n],\hat A[n])=K(A[n])$ contains a primitive $n$'th root of unity. In general, there should be some condition in terms of the smallest degree of a polarization of $A/K$.

$\endgroup$
3
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ But one knows (“Zarhin's trick”) that $A^4$ has a principal polarization. Since $K(A[n])=K(A^4[n])$, this implies that the result holds in general! $\endgroup$
    – ACL
    Jul 1, 2015 at 8:41
  • $\begingroup$ @ACL Very nice! $\endgroup$ Jul 1, 2015 at 10:58
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @JoeSilverman: Unfortunately, I made a confusion and (see Zarhin's comment above), it is $(A\times A^{\vee })^4$ which is principally polarized. $\endgroup$
    – ACL
    Jul 2, 2015 at 9:17

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.