# Denumerable sets [closed]

I have seen recently the use of "denumerable" to mean one of:

• countably infinite

• countable

Do you condone the use of denumerable to mean any of the above? Which one?

-

## closed as off topic by Harry Gindi, gowers, José Figueroa-O'Farrill, Tom Leinster, Loop SpaceApr 9 '10 at 14:05

Questions on MathOverflow are expected to relate to research level mathematics within the scope defined by the community. Consider editing the question or leaving comments for improvement if you believe the question can be reworded to fit within the scope. Read more about reopening questions here.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

This is very close to a poll... IMO MO is not a great place for them. In any case, you probably should edit this into community-wiki, for there is not really an answer to your question. – Mariano Suárez-Alvarez Apr 9 '10 at 9:26
Lang uses denumerable to mean countably infinite in Algebra, but I believe that the word was originally synonymous with countable. – Harry Gindi Apr 9 '10 at 12:07
+1 for being named afer a beloved Star Wars character. :) – Pete L. Clark Apr 22 '10 at 13:03

Here is a summary of standard parlance in set theory.

• A set is finite if it is equinumerous with a natural number. Otherwise, the set is infinite.

• A set is countable if it is equinumerous with a subset of the natural numbers. (This includes the finite sets.)

• A set is countably infinite if it is countable and infinite. This is also called countably enumerable.

• A set is Dedekind finite if it is not bijective with any proper subset of itself. This is equivalent to the set not containing any countably infinite subset. If the Axiom of Choice holds, it is equivalent to being finite.

• The word enumerable is often used with countable sets, but does not by itself imply countability. For example, set theorists often enumerate uncountable sets in a well-ordered sequence. The word enumeration carries a connotation of being well-ordered, but this is not strict, since one might enumerate a set by reals, meaning simply to have a surjection from the reals onto the set.

• Some set theorists use denumerable synonymously with countable (e.g. Moschovakis, Notes on Set Theory, undergraduate textbook). Many or most set theorists seldom use the word denumerable. In a quick perusal, I couldn't find use of it in Jech's book Set Theory or Kanamori's book on large cardinals.

Of course, all these concepts originate with Cantor, and I looked up his Contributions to the founding of the theory of Transfinite Numbers (Dover, in translation by Jourdain). I couldn't find the word denumerable at all, but Cantor does use enumerable at first just to mean countable, but then later extended to include uncountable well-ordered enumerations, as I mentioned above.

-