13
$\begingroup$

Let $w$ be a group word with variables $\bar x, \bar y$, where $\bar x=(x_1,\dots ,x_m)$ and $\bar y=(y_1,\dots ,y_n).$ I am interested in the following questions.

(1) Is the sentence $(\forall\bar x)(\exists\bar y)w=1$ true in every group if it is true in every finite group?

(2) Is the sentence $(\exists\bar x)(\forall\bar y)w=1$ true in every group if it is true in every finite group?

For $m=2$ and $n=4$ the answer to (1) is negative, in general, as shown in T. Coulbois, A. Khelif, Proc. AMS 127 (1999), No. 4, 963--965.

In On sentences true in all finite groups I asked the questions (1) and (2) for $m=n=1$.

Bjørn Kjos-Hanssen gave positive answers to these questions. In fact, his answers can be generalized: an answer is positive for (1) if $m=1$, and for (2) if $n=1$. The open questions I want to ask:

(a) Is $(\forall xy)(\exists z)w(x,y,z)=1$ true in every group if it is true in every finite group?

(b) Is $(\exists x)(\forall yz)w(x,y,z)=1$ true in every group if it is true in every finite group?

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ This time it will have to involve non-abelian groups it seems. $\endgroup$ May 29, 2015 at 2:45
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, you are right. Also, I guess that, probably, answers to these questions are negative. $\endgroup$
    – owb
    May 29, 2015 at 3:19
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ About (2): The sentence $\exists x\forall y_1,\dots,y_k:w(x,y_1,\dots,y_k)=1$ holds in every group iff it holds in a free group of countable rank, iff $w(1,y_1,\dots,y_k)=1$ as abstract word. I'm not sure if the same conclusion if the above sentence is only supposed to hold in every finite group. $\endgroup$
    – YCor
    May 29, 2015 at 12:57

0

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.