Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Given a regular ring $A$ with an element $t$, consider the "generalised" semistable model
$S := A[X_1,...,X_n]/(P_1\cdots P_n - t)$ over $A$, where $P_i := {X_i}^{e_i}$ and $e_i$ are positive integers.

Question: For which $A$, $t$, and $(e_i)$ is $S$ regular?

E.g., when $n=2$ and $A$ is a discrete valuation ring and $t$ is a uniformiser, then it is easy to prove that $S$ is regular when $e_1$ and $e_2$ are both equal to 1. When $n\ge 3$ and $(A,t)$ is a DVR with uniformiser $t$, is there a reference?

share|improve this question
Assuming $\sum e_i > 1$ it is homework for general regular $A$ except if all $e_i$ divisible by common prime $p$ s.t. $A[1/t]$ has prime of residue char. $p > 0$ with $A$ of char. 0 (hint: regularity of $A/(t)$ is relevant). Exceptional case equivalent to instances of $R[x]/(x^{p^c} - u)$ for $c \ge 1$ and regular local $R$ of mixed char. $(0,p)$ and unit $u$ s.t. $x^p - u$ is irred. over frac. field of $R$ and $u$ a $p$-power in residue field. Then no clean answer; try 1-units in dvrs (write $x = 1+y$). Please work out details of above for yourself; it is far more instructive that way. –  BCnrd Apr 7 '10 at 11:35

1 Answer 1

Thank you for your reply!

BCnrd: Do you mean the sum of the $e_i$ is $>1$, or rather $e:=gcd(e_i)$ invertible in $A$?

Granted, some aspects of the problem are homework, for instance when $A$ and $A/(t)$ are regular and $e$ is invertible, then it's standard, Jac. criterion and the standard prop.'s of regular rings. What's really being asked is how does Reg(A) compare to Reg(S) for a given vector of positive integers (e_i) and $t \in A$. Even if $e$ is not invertible in $A$, the regularity of the locus of V(t) in $S$ is easy. So then the interesting locus is $V(e)$ when it is not empty.

So assume the prime in $Spec(S)$ belongs to $D(t)$ and $V(e)$. Restrict to the case initially where $A$ is regular and $t$ is a unit. How does one get to those exceptional cases?

share|improve this answer
@Lutz, I think we say the same thing: focus on regular $A$ and $t$ a unit, only problem at pts upstairs over which $A$ has residue char. $p > 0$ dividing $e$, say $e_i = p^c e'_i$ with $c > 0$ and some $e'_i$ not divisible by $p$. Then $S = (A[x]/(x^{p^c} - t))[Y_1,\dots,Y_n]/(\prod Y_i^{e'_i} - x)$; note $x$ is unit in $A[x]/(x^{p^c}-t)$. Ring $S$ is f. flat over $A[x]/(x^{p^c}-t)$, so if $S$ is regular then $A[x]/(x^{p^c}-t)$ must be regular (!!). That brings us to study the latter ring, whose regularity or not is easy away from exceptional case (if I'm not mistaken). Does that clarify it? –  BCnrd Jun 18 '10 at 16:04

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.