I want to know about people in researching complex (maybe differential) geometry are careing about what currently ? For example ,$L^2$ estimate inspired by Lars Hormander is a very useful tool,and how does this theory be developed currently ? As myself , i like this method very much ,but i don't know which is the next important problem be solved by this method . How far will this method go ? As well , just like the holomorphic morse inequalities , when it is proved by Demailly in 1985,twenty years passed , it seems that during thest twenty years there are no important results comes out in complex geometry ? I'm a beginner in complex geometry, i think that i can't scratch the direction of complex geometry ? I don't know people are careing about what in complex geometry ?Only doing some little questions or leave this field? So this is just the purpose of this question i asked , i want to communicate with all who are interested in this field.

One major area of research is that of canonical metrics on Kahler manifolds. The original definition of "canonical" is due to Calabi. One considers all metrics in a fixed Kahler class and attempts to minimise the L^2norm of the curvature tensor. The EulerLagrange equations say that a metric is a critical point for this functional precisely when its scalar curvature has holomorphic gradient. Such metrics are called extremal. Special cases include KahlerEinstein metrics and constant scalar curvature metrics. Enormous amounts of research have been done in this direction. In one direction, one tries to prove existence. A random selection of results: Aubin and Yau's work on KahlerEinstein metrics of negative and zero scalar curvature, Tian's work on KahlerEinstein surfaces of positive scalar curvature, more recently Donaldson's work on extremal metrics on toric surfaces. In the opposite direction, one tries to find obstructions to existence. Futaki found one such obstruction, involving holomorphic vector fields, which was then vastly generalised by Tian and Donaldson. This gives examples of many manifolds and Kahler classes which can never admit extremal metrics. There is a conjecture (due in various forms to Donaldson, Tian and Yau) which says that the known obstructions are the only obstructions. When they vanish, an extremal metric exists. This would be a beautiful result because the obstructions are purely algebrogeometric (at least when the Kahler class is integral) yet the conclusion is analytic  we can find a metric which solves a PDE. If you know of the HitchinKobayashi correspondence for Hermitian YangMills metrics on vector bundles, this conjecture can be seen as the analogue for Kahler metrics. At the moment, the conjecture is known to hold for toric surfaces (Donaldson) and is close to being settled for KahlerEinstein metrics. This is due to AubinYau for negative scalar curvature, and Yau for zero scalar curvature  in these cases the metrics always exist. The positive scalar curvature case is far more delicate. Donaldson recently announced significant progress in this direction. If you are looking for a link with Hormander's L^2 estimates, then look no further than projective embeddings via higher and higher powers of a positive line bundle L over your Kahler manifold X. For each power of L we consider the following problem: find a basis of holomorphic sections of L so that the image of X in CP^{n} has zero centre of mass (to define centre of mass we think of CP^{n} as a coadjoint orbit in the linear space su(n+1)^{*} equiped with an innerproduct via the Killing form). This can be thought of as a finite dimensional analogue of the problem of finding an extremal metric representing the first Chern class of L. As the power of L tends to infinity, these projective problems converge in some sense to the problem of finding an extremal metric. Understanding the precise nature of this convergence involves difficult questions concerning the Bergman kernel and, ultimately, Hormander's estimate. (Again, this part of the story is due to Donaldson.) To get started you could look at:



There also problems along the lines of proving L2 extension theorems for vector valued forms (there are such theorems already like the OhsawaTakegoshi extension theorem however, that applies to (n,1) forms. We want more general results). Besides, there is the problem of deformation invariance of plurigenera over Kahler manifolds (Siu proved it for the projective case). 

