0
$\begingroup$

Description: Given the following parametric cubic polynomials ${E}^{3} - 15\, {\beta}_{\pm}\, {E}^{2} - 3 \left({71\, {\beta}_{\pm}^{2} + 352\, {\beta}_{\mp}}\right) E + 135\, {\beta}_{\pm} \left({5\, {\beta}_{\pm}^{2} - 32\, {\beta}_{\mp}}\right)$ where ${\beta}_{\pm} = 1 \pm \eta$, how do I find all possible rational values of $\eta$ such that this polynomial is reducible.

Background: I have found 61 rational values of $\eta$ that factor these polynomials into a rational linear $E - p/q$ for integer $p$ and $q$ relatively prime and $q \ne 0$ times an irreducible quadratic of the form ${E}^{2} + a\, E + b$. I do not know if there are an infinite number of such values and if not do I have the complete set.

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ I updated my posting and simplified the description for clarity. Simply put I am looking for all the cases where these parametric cubics are reducible over rationals. $\endgroup$ Mar 16, 2015 at 23:16
  • $\begingroup$ The curve is rational. $\endgroup$ Mar 17, 2015 at 1:32
  • $\begingroup$ Yes I am looking for the rational points. $\endgroup$ Mar 17, 2015 at 1:36
  • $\begingroup$ @LorenzMenke I said the curve is rational, as in parametrizable by rational functions. $\endgroup$ Mar 17, 2015 at 1:42

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

I just reopened the question so I can write an answer, although my comment should have sufficed but I may not be getting my message across.

Anyway, let's use some sane variables ($x=\beta_{\pm},y = E$), so the polynomial is

$$y^3-15xy^2-3(71x^2+352x)y+135x(5x^2-32x)$$

Let's now replace $y$ by $xz$ and get

$$(z^3 - 15z^2 - 213z + 675)x^3 + (-1056z - 4320)x^2.$$

So you can pick any rational $z$ that you like, compute

$$x = (1056z + 4320)/(z^3 - 15z^2 - 213z + 675)$$

and if you replace the value of $x=\beta_{\pm}$ by what you computed, the resulting cubic in $E$ has a factor $E - xz$.

$\endgroup$
7
  • $\begingroup$ Unless I'm missing something, you get a different polynomial if you replace both $\beta_\pm$ and $\beta_\mp$ by the same variable $x$. $\endgroup$
    – j.c.
    Mar 17, 2015 at 4:38
  • $\begingroup$ @j.c. Oh, I missed that, there are two different betas in the polynomial. I need to redo this. Thanks. $\endgroup$ Mar 17, 2015 at 17:17
  • $\begingroup$ But what does it actually mean? I would understand $\beta_+ = 1 + \eta, \beta_- = 1 - \eta$ but I don't actually know the difference between $1 \pm \eta$ and $1 \mp \eta$. $\endgroup$ Mar 17, 2015 at 17:19
  • $\begingroup$ I believe that there are two different polynomials under consideration, one where you always take the upper signs so that $\beta_\pm=\beta_+$ and $\beta_\mp=\beta_-$, and similarly, another polynomial corresponding to the lower signs. $\endgroup$
    – j.c.
    Mar 18, 2015 at 2:17
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Yes there are two such polynomials. My notation was not very clear. Take all upper or all lower signs for the two cases. The above solution is essentially correct with a correction that the resulting polynomial in x is the form $a {x}^3 + b {x}^2 + c x$. This factors as x times a quadratic. Solving the quadratic results in a quartic discriminant. This converts to an elliptic curve with a couple of torsion points. There is one generator point hence an infinite number of solutions which is what I was looking for. Thank you all for the suggestions on the original algebraic manipulation. $\endgroup$ Mar 21, 2015 at 0:54

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.