Page not found
This question was removed from MathOverflow for reasons of moderation. Please refer to the help center for possible explanations why a question might be removed.
Here are some similar questions that might be relevant:
- Can SAT be solved in time n^k, for a specific k?
- Does the independence of P = NP imply existence of arbitrarily good super-polynomial upper bound for SAT?
- Can knowing ahead the length of 3-SAT instance really help?
- Is pattern recognition NP-complete?
- How much of P versus NP's difficulty stems from having to rule out the existence of Turing machines that "accidentally" solve, say, 3-SAT efficiently?
- What arguments do exist against defining completeness in NP using injective Karp reductions?
- On generating squarefree integers and primes?
- Representing mathematical statements as SAT instances
- Most efficient reductions between NP-complete problems
Try a Google Search
Try searching for similar questions
Browse our recent questions
Browse our popular tags
If you feel something is missing that should be here, contact us.