MathOverflow will be down for maintenance for approximately 3 hours, starting Monday evening (06/24/2013) at approximately 9:00 PM Eastern time (UTC-4).
5

Say we have three infinite sequences $\{a_i\},\{b_i\},\{c_i\}$ of natural numbers, satisfying the equations $$a_1+b_1=c_1,\dots, a_n+b_n=c_n,\dots $$ Assume further that $gcd(a_i,b_i,c_i)=1$ for each $i$ and that $(a_i,b_i,c_i)\neq (a_j,b_j,c_j)$ for all $i,j$. Now let's define $S$ as the set of primes $p$ which divide $a_ib_ic_i$ for at least one $i$. From the S-unit theorem we know that $S$ has to be infinite.

Now the question is: Can $S$ be sparse? This can be taken to mean Dirichlet density zero, for example.

I haven't thought much about this but there are reasons to believe the answer is yes, indeed if there are infinitely many Mersenne primes $q=2^p-1$ then the equations $1+q=2^p$ give such a sparse $S$. However, I am looking for an unconditional result.

flag
Instead of asking about density $0$, it would make more sense to ask whether for any $f:\mathbb N\to\mathbb N$ we may have $S=\{p_j\}$ with $p_{j+1}>f(p_j)$. All the counterexamples below fail dramatically even for $f(x)=x^2$. – fedja Apr 29 2010 at 3:53
Fedja, that is a very interesting question. I cannot say anything meaningful except that the Mersenne primes again suggest that the answer should be yes.. – Gjergji Zaimi Apr 29 2010 at 5:47

3 Answers

10

Yes, in fact, you can make $S$ grow as slowly as you like. This follows, for example, from the fact that there exist 3-term arithmetic progressions of primes $(p,q,r)$ with $\min(p,q,r)$ arbitrarily large. For each such arithmetic progression, you can take $(a_i,b_i,c_i)=(p,r,2q)$. Now just choose these arithmetic progressions one at a time, making sure that the primes involved each time are much larger than any primes appearing earlier.

link|flag
Very nice, I knew I should have thought about it some more :) – Gjergji Zaimi Mar 27 2010 at 23:08
4

Alternatively, every prime dividing $2^{2^k}+1$ must be 1 mod $2^k$, hence must be at least $2^k$. So if you take your triples of the form $(1,2^{2^k},2^{2^k}+1)$ with the values of $k$ sufficiently sparse, you get what you want.

link|flag
That's a lot easier to justify than what I was proposing! – Bjorn Poonen Mar 28 2010 at 5:57
2

An even simpler answer: take triples of the form $(2,n!-1,n!+1)$ for a sufficiently sparse sequence of values of $n$.

link|flag

Your Answer

Get an OpenID
or

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.