MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I ran into a "well-known identity" on page 345 of Shepp and Lloyd's On ordered cycle lengths in a random permutation: $$\int_x^{\infty} \frac{\exp(-y)}y dy = \int_0^x \frac{1-\exp(-y)}y dy - \log x - \gamma, $$ where $\gamma$ is the Euler constant. I am clueless as to how it is derived. Any reference to the derivation of such formulae would suffice, but an explicit solution will also be appreciated.

share|cite|improve this question
This refers to an earlier question:… – Michael Lugo Mar 27 '10 at 18:23
A link to an online copy of the paper (preferably not behind a paywall) would be highly appropriate here. – Scott Morrison Mar 27 '10 at 18:46
I added a JSTOR link. The article is also at, but the link is probably temporary. – Anton Geraschenko Mar 27 '10 at 19:09
Meta discussion:… – Harry Gindi Mar 27 '10 at 19:15
up vote 6 down vote accepted

You can apply WZ theory to such identities. In particular, both sides satisfy $$x*z''(x) + (x+1)z'(x)$$ Picking $x=1$ as the initial condition (since the DE is regular there, that helps), we see that both sides evaluate to $Ei(1,1)$ and their derivatives both evaluate to $-1/e$, so they are equal.

I got that differential equation using Maple's PDEtools[dpolyform] function, which uses Groebner bases over differential polynomials to 'solve' this problem. All the rest is classical analysis (as in A course of modern analysis by Whittaker and Watson, 1926 - which is unfortunately not material that is taught very much anymore, I certainly had to learn a lot of that 'on my own').

[Edit: fixed an error in the evaluation of the derivative, I pasted in the wrong line]

share|cite|improve this answer
Yes that's a tremendously rich text much of which I am not familiar with. Thanks for the hard work! – John Jiang Mar 27 '10 at 21:08
What is "WZ theory"? – Mariano Suárez-Alvarez Mar 27 '10 at 21:59
Wilf-Zeilberger, probably, see – Reid Barton Mar 27 '10 at 22:02
@Reid: correct. – Jacques Carette Mar 27 '10 at 22:04

This identity appears on the Wikipedia page for the "exponential integral":

I imagine you can get it by integrating the Taylor series and playing around. Wikipedia, and several other places on the web, point to the book by Abramovitz and Stegun.

share|cite|improve this answer
Thanks for the nice reference on wiki! I was looking at the wrong place. – John Jiang Mar 27 '10 at 19:46
You can prove the identity up to a constant factor by differentiating with respect to x, so it only remains to prove it for x = 1. This should be a little easier. – Qiaochu Yuan Mar 27 '10 at 19:55
Indeed, it makes it a lot easier. Using integration by part, one can show that $\int_1^{\infty} \exp(-y)/y dy - \int_0^1 \frac{1-\exp(-y)}{y}dy = \int_0^{\infty} \exp(-y) \log y dy which is listed as equal to $-\gamma$ in the following wiki page:… I am yet to figure out why that formula in the wiki page is true. – John Jiang Mar 27 '10 at 20:51
The integral $\int_0^\infty e^{-t}\log t\,dt$ equals $\Gamma'(1)$. This can be evauated as $-\gamma$ using the infinite product for the gamma function. – Robin Chapman Mar 28 '10 at 7:58
Thanks Robin. I will write a short summary of the proof combining all the ingredients given so far. – John Jiang Mar 28 '10 at 18:02

So one of the approaches to proving the equality in the question is via the following three steps: First differentiate both sides of the equation to see that they agree up to a constant. This reduces to showing the case of $x = 1$, for which $\log x = 0$.

Next we apply integration by parts to get $$ \int_1^{\infty} \exp(-y)/y dy - \int_0^1 \frac{1-\exp(-y)}{y}dy = \int_0^{\infty} \exp(-y) \log y dy $$

Finally observe that $\Gamma'(1)$ equals the RHS, by differentiating under the integral sign, valid because things are decaying fast enough at infinity.

So it remains to show $\Gamma'(1) =\gamma$. I saw a soft argument (i.e., without using infinite product) in the link This is re-exposed below:

first we establish that for $\Psi(x) = \log \Gamma(x)$, $$ \Psi'(x+1) = \Psi'(x) + 1/x $$ This is easy enough since we have we have the functional equation $\Gamma(x+1) = x\Gamma(x)$. Next using stirling approximation we get

$$ \Psi(x+1) = (x+1/2)\log x -x + 1/2 \log 2 \pi + O(1/x) $$ and then they differentiate this and claim that $O(1/x)' = O(1/x^2)$, which is clearly false (take $f(x) = 1/x cos(e^x)$). But I found in Wikipedia another formula that gives the precise error term in terms of an integral of the monotone function $arctan(1/x)$. So this is enough to establish $O(1/x^2)$ for the error term in the derivative of $\Psi$. So we get the asymptotics $\lim_{x \to \infty} \Psi'(x+1) = \log(x)$, from which we get $\Psi'(1) = \gamma$. Now notice $\Psi'(x) = \Gamma'(x)/ \Gamma(x)$, and $\Gamma(1) = 1$, so $\Gamma'(1) = \gamma$ also.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.