5
$\begingroup$

I have a smooth curve of length $L$ with a single cusp point $P$ occuring at length $s = L_P$. Let the curve in arc length parametrization be $\alpha_t(s) \equiv (X_t(s),Y_t(s)) $. They are actually a family of curves as parameter $t$ varies, but the length of the curve remains same with changes in $t$, except the tangents of the curve rotate with different angular speeds, with variations in $t$. The cusp point $P$ at $s= L_P$ remains as cusp for all $t$.

I want to measure how straight the curve at every instant $t$, by its moment of inertia about its center of mass, given as, $$I_{0,L}(t) = \int_{0}^{L}(t) ((X_t(s)-X_{cm})^2 + (Y_t(s)-Y_{cm})^2) ds, $$ where $X_{cm} = \frac{1}{L}\int_{0}^{L}X_t(s)ds$ and $Y_{cm} = \frac{1}{L}\int_{0}^{L}Y_t(s)ds$.

Question : Its a bit subjective. Does it make more sense mathematically, to break the curve into two, the segments between $(0,L_P)$ and $(L_P,L)$, and then measure the straightness of the two curves separately as $I_{0,L_P}(t)$ and $I_{L_P,L}(t)$ using the above formula. Of course we do not get the straightness of entire curve this way, but I just want a reason to abandon the idea of using straightness of entire curve for any mathematical purpose and using straightness of each segment, but for a slightly different purpose, to derive more meaningful mathematical conclusions, which would make more mathematical sense.

The curvature as a function of a parameter, of the specific curve I am interested in is at this link

PS : I heard arc length parametrization is not possible for curve with a cusp, but I guess we are not using an local properties of the curve, so assume it is not a hindrance.

PS : Moment of inertia about center of mass is maximum when the curve is a straight line, as per this question

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ A smooth arc-length parametrization is not possible for a curve with a cusp. However it is possible if you remove either "smooth" or "arc-length" from the requirements. $\endgroup$
    – robjohn
    Jan 2, 2015 at 4:01
  • $\begingroup$ @robjohn : Can you expand a bit with some reasons, guess that would potentially be an answer. $\endgroup$
    – Rajesh D
    Jan 2, 2015 at 15:21
  • $\begingroup$ @TedShifrin : Could you expand, i don't understand what you mean by inverse, partly due to my ignorance. $\endgroup$
    – Rajesh D
    Jan 2, 2015 at 23:55
  • $\begingroup$ Deleted my answer because of the uneasy feeling that it's a misfit to the question. $\endgroup$
    – Han de Bruijn
    Jan 7, 2015 at 17:40

0

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.