MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let $X$ be a scheme. Suppose you are given a sheaf of Abelian groups $\mathcal{A}$ over $X$. How can you determine if $\mathcal{A}$ is the underlying Abelian sheaf of a sheaf of $O_X$-modules? In other words, is it possible to characterize in some (interesting) way the essential image of the forgetful functor from $Mod(O_X)$ to $Ab(X)$?

I'm not sure a non-tautological answer exists...

share|cite|improve this question
Did you mean that you need a definition other than the one on Hartshorne? What do you mean by being non-tautological? – 7-adic Mar 25 '10 at 19:41
Note that all curves (over a fixed algebraically closed field say) are homemorophic in the Zariski topology. Hence you can take a quasi-coherent sheaf on one curve and then transfer it by a homeomorphism to another curve where it very rarely will come from a quasi-coherent sheaf. This makes it very unlikely that there is any kind of reasonable description of the essential image (other than the tautological one). – Torsten Ekedahl Mar 25 '10 at 20:41
Torsten- Are you sure that the isomorphism type of (say) the structure sheaf of a curve depends on the complex structure of the curve as a sheaf of a abelian groups? I'm not convinced either way. – Ben Webster Mar 25 '10 at 21:33
@Ben: Good question, it made me come up with an answer. On affine curves (and on $\mathbb P^1$) the first cohomology cohomology group of the structure sheaf is zero but on other curves it isn't (if one considers $k$-sheaves instead of sheaves of abelian groups one can even recover the genus of a smooth and proper curve). – Torsten Ekedahl Mar 29 '10 at 13:19
up vote 13 down vote accepted

1) There is a very simple example that shows that it is impossible to answer the question of whether $\mathcal{A}$ comes from a quasi-coherent sheaf $\mathcal{F}$ on $X$ if all one is given is the underlying topological space $|X|$ and $\mathcal{A}$ as a sheaf on $|X|$. Namely, if $|X|$ is a point and $\mathcal{A}$ is such that $\mathcal{A}(|X|)=\mathbf{Q}$, then either outcome is possible: the answer is YES if $X=\operatorname{Spec} \mathbf{Q}$, but NO if $X=\operatorname{Spec} \mathbf{F}_p$.

2) There are some nontrivial necessary conditions that one can state in terms of the topological space and the sheaf of abelian groups alone. For example, in order for $\mathcal{A}$ to come from a quasi-coherent sheaf, there must exist an open covering $(U_i)$ of $|X|$ such that the sheaf $\mathcal{A}|_{U_i}$ on $U_i$ is acyclic for every $i$.

3) The condition in 2) is definitely not sufficient, even if the scheme structure on $|X|$ is not specified in advance. For instance the constant sheaf $\mathbf{Z}/6\mathbf{Z}$ on a point is acyclic, but it cannot be a quasi-coherent sheaf for any scheme structure on the point.

share|cite|improve this answer
These minimalist examples are real mathematical haikus: thanks, Bjorn. – Georges Elencwajg Mar 26 '10 at 10:02

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.