Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Dear all

While studying the overlap distribution for two random Cantor sets (long story made short), I came across the following problem.

$G(k)$ is a complex valued function, and satisfy the following condition:

$G(k\mu) = G(k)^2+ \beta$

with $\beta,\mu$ constant (in my case $\beta=\frac{2}{9}, \mu = \frac{4}{3}$)

Is there a way to find the functional form of $G(k)$ which satisfy the condition?

Note that for $\beta = 0$, $G(k)=\exp\left(a k^{\log_\mu 2}\right)$, ($a$ konstant) will satisfy the condition (easily verified), but I have no idea on how to find a solution for non-zero $\beta$. I'm a not a math student (I'm studying physics), but I have never seen problems like this before. Is there a way to find analytical expression for $G(k)$? Possible as an expansion?

I can generate a function which has this property on the computer. Writing $G(k)= x(k) + i y(k)$, with $x(k)=x(-k)$ and $y(k)=-y(-k)$ the function should look something like this:

http://dl.dropbox.com/u/483049/xy.pdf

-- jon

share|improve this question
    
The latex notation does not seem to show properly in Firefox. I don't know the reason. Hope the question is clear. –  jonalm Mar 24 '10 at 12:03
    
It looks good to me in Firefox 3.5.8 on the Mac. What is the problem you see? –  Harald Hanche-Olsen Mar 24 '10 at 12:31
    
@Harald: I use Firefox 3.6.2 on Mac. It show like this: dl.dropbox.com/u/483049/screenshot.tiff –  jonalm Mar 24 '10 at 13:20
    
Hit the "reprocess math" button on the right sidebar. –  JBL Mar 24 '10 at 13:26
    
Got it. Thanks. –  jonalm Mar 24 '10 at 13:30
add comment

1 Answer 1

up vote 3 down vote accepted

You do not give any smoothness requirement; I will look for an analytic $G$: $$ G(k)=\sum_{n=0}^\infty a_nk^n.$$ In what follows, I assume also that $\mu=4/3$ and $\beta=2/9$. Expanding in a power series both sides of the equation and equating coefficients, we get that $a_0=1/3$ or $a_0=2/3$. In the first case we obtain the constant solution $G(k)=1/3$. But in the second case, we find a one parameter family of (formal) solutions, parametrized by the value of $a_1$: $$ a_0=\frac23,\quad a_1\in\mathbb{C},\quad a_n=\frac{1}{\mu^n-\mu}\sum_{i=1}^{n-1}a_ia_{n-i},\quad n>2. $$ For $a_1=0$ we obtain the constant solution $G(k)=2/3$. For other values of $a_1$, one should check that the series has a positive radius of convergence.

Another way of obtainig solutions is the following. Choose an arbitrary function $h\colon[1,\mu]\to\mathbb{C}$, and define $G(k)=h(k)$ if $1\le k<\mu$; for $\mu\le k<\mu^2$, let $G(k)=G(k/\mu)^2+\beta$; iterate this procedure to define $G$ on $[1,\infty)$. Now, for $1/\mu\le k<1$, let $G(k)=\pm\sqrt{G(\mu k)^2-\beta}$; iterate the procedure to define $G$ on $(0,1)$. Conditions can be impposed on the arbitrary function $h$ to make $G$ continuous, for instance ($G(\mu)=G(1)^2+\beta$).

share|improve this answer
    
Thank you so much Julián. But this solution raise another question for me. You see that G(k)= $\tilde F(k)$ is the Fourier transform of F(x). And I want find an expression of F(x), but every term in the inverse Fourier transformation (from the series expansion) seem to diverge. Is it a way to tackle this problem? Assume $a_1= const.i$ as this will make F(x) a real function. –  jonalm Mar 27 '10 at 13:44
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.