MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Matthew Emerton mentioned recently the relevance of Dwork's "p-adic cycles". As I wonder if I should read that, reviews of it are ambiguous, I'd be happy on remarks and possible further bibl. hints. And I'd enjoy hints where one finds surveys etc. related to Mazur's "Theme of p-adic variation" and how that develops.

share|cite|improve this question
There's really no need to abbreviate in the title. It just makes it harder for people to read the front page. – Ben Webster Mar 24 '10 at 11:01

You could read Mazur's article in the $p$-adic monodromy volume. And also Katz's Travaux de Dwork, as well as his two articles on Serre--Tate theory (LNM 828?), and the accompanying article of Deligne and Illusie on K3 surfaces. You could also read Gross's Tameness Criterion paper in Duke from the late 80s, which uses Dwork's ideas and related $p$-adic techniques. And there is Nygaard's article on the Tate conjecture for K3's over finite fields.

Dwork is difficult, and I don't recommend reading him in a vacuum or for casual entertainment. But his ideas and insights are very deep, and very original. (His actual techniques are very involved, and I am not sure that I would recommend learning them before you learned some more standard ideas from $p$-adic geometry, such as are explained in the above references.)

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.