Is there a standard notion of non-degeneracy for multilinear forms?
My motivation is simple curiosity, by the way!
|
7
|
Is there a standard notion of non-degeneracy for multilinear forms? My motivation is simple curiosity, by the way! |
||||||||||||||
|
|
9
|
I'm not sure if this notion is "standard", but there is one such notion, used for example in Nigel Hitchin's paper Stable forms and special metrics (arXiv:math/0107101) for alternating multilinear forms. The idea is that symplectic structures on a vector space $V$ can be characterised by the fact that they lie in an open orbit of $\mathrm{GL}(V)$ on $\Lambda^2V^*$. Hitchin calls these stable forms and shows that apart from the the case of symplectic forms, there are stable $3$-forms in dimensions 6,7 and 8; the $G_2$-invariant $3$-form in a seven-dimensional vector space (i.e., the imaginary component of the multiplication of imaginary octonions) being one such example. Hitchin's notion is very fruitful, as it provides a variational approach to 7-dimensional riemannian metrics of weak $G_2$ holonomy, for example. |
|||
|
|
2
|
Basic idea: a bilinear form $B$ is degenerate if there are two nonzero vectors $v$ and $w$ so that not only is $$B(v,w)=0,$$ but also either vector is enough to kill $B$ without help from the other: $$B(v,-) = 0 \mbox{ and } B(-,w)=0.$$ Another way to say it: even if we perturb $v$ and $w$, $B(v \otimes w)=0$ to first order. From this point of view, we see that a bilinear form is degenerate iff it is an element of the variety dual to the Segre embedding of $\mathbb{P}V \times \mathbb{P}W$ in $\mathbb{P}(V \otimes W)$. This motivation generalizes gracefully to the following definition from Gelfand, Kapranov, and Zelevinsky's book Discriminants, resultants, and multidimensional determinants: A $p$-linear form $T$ is said to be degenerate if either of the following equivalent conditions holds:
In certain favorable cases (when the dimensions of the vector spaces $V_i$ are not too different) the dual to the Segre is a hypersurface; in other words, there is a single polynomial---the hyperdeterminant---which vanishes exactly at the degenerate multilinear forms. This polynomial possesses many magical properties and is much subtler than determinants of bilinear forms. I can attest that this definition is at least useful, if not standard, since it came up in a substantial way in an elementary question about coin flipping: http://arxiv.org/abs/1009.4188 . |
|||
|
|