Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Is there some generalization of the Jordan-Hölder decomposition for group objects in a category $\mathcal{C}$?

If $\mathcal{C}$ is the category Sch$(S)$ of schemes over a base scheme $S$ then (I think) this is true, also probably for other categories of "spaces" like Top or Diff it should be true, but I don't have any idea for general categories.

share|improve this question
    
In a general category, it's not a priori true that even the isomorphism theorems will hold. For an example, see this answer by JS Milne about classical reductive groups. If these "theorems" don't hold, I think it's pretty clear that you can't prove Jordan-Hölder. –  Harry Gindi Mar 20 '10 at 13:01
    
Could you be more specific as to what you mean by the Jordan-Holder decomposition? Do you mean the uniqueness of composition factors (as multisets) in any two composition series? (Of course any kind of statement about existence of composition series is not going to be true even for general group objects in the category of sets.) –  Pete L. Clark Mar 20 '10 at 16:12
    
That's exactly what I meant, given that there exists a composition series, it should be unique up to permutation. After thinkingof it for a while, I believe that it should be true for any category in which the second isomorphism theorem holds. –  Cristos A. Ruiz Mar 20 '10 at 17:02
    
Which one is the second iso thm? It varies according to who you ask. –  Tom Leinster Mar 21 '10 at 2:41
    
I mean the following: if $S$ is a subgroup and $N$ a normal subgroup of $G$ then $N$ is normal in $NS$, $N\cap S$ is normal in $S$ and $NS/N$ is isomorphic to $S/N\cap S$. –  Cristos A. Ruiz Mar 22 '10 at 18:34
add comment

1 Answer

up vote 5 down vote accepted

You can start by looking at the paper by P.J. Hilton and W. Ledermann, "On the Jordan-Hölder theorem in homological monoids", where three axioms are needed to establish the decomposition, and the third one is essentially guaranteeing the second isomorphism theorem.

In "Mal'cev, protomodular, homological and semi-abelian categories" by F. Borceux, D. Bourn, there is a chapter devoted to homological categories (which are pointed, regular and protomodular), these are the categories where certain lemmas of homological algebra hold true (five lemma, nine lemma, snake lemma, Noether isomorphism theorems etc.). The fact that Jordan-Holder holds for these categories is proven in "Jordan-Holder, Modularity and Distributivity in Non-Commutative Algebra" by F. Borceux, M. Grandis.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.