5
$\begingroup$

Is the unit tangent bundle of $S^{n}$ a parallelizable manifold. This is motivated by the fact that $TS^{n}$ is parallelizable?

$\endgroup$
14
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ I thought the tangent bundle $TS^n$ is parallelizable if and only if $n\in\{1;3;7\}$. For $n$ even you won't even find a nowhere vanishing vector field on $S^n$! $\endgroup$ Nov 5, 2014 at 15:55
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @AliTaghavi, it would probably help to mention the ambiguity that naturally arises here. You might include your qualification in the statement of the question. $\endgroup$ Nov 5, 2014 at 16:02
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @PeterCrooks I consider $M=$ the unit tangent bundle of $S^{n}$. Is $M$, as a manifold, parallelizable? Note that there is no a primary obstruction since the euler charactristic iz $0=0\times 2$ $\endgroup$ Nov 5, 2014 at 16:04
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ The unit tangent bundle of the 2-sphere is parallelisable. In fact, every orientable 3-manifold is parallelisable. The latter can be proven by Computing $w_2=0$. $\endgroup$
    – ThiKu
    Nov 5, 2014 at 16:11
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ The unit tangent bundle of a sphere is usually just called a Stiefel manifold (of 2-frames). $\endgroup$ Nov 5, 2014 at 17:39

1 Answer 1

12
$\begingroup$

W.Sutherland. A note on the parallelizability of sphere bundles over sphere. J. London Math. Soc. 39 (1964), 55--62.

The answer is yes.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you very much for your answer and the reference. $\endgroup$ Nov 5, 2014 at 20:13

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.