7
$\begingroup$

Let $Y$ be a Siegel variety and let $X$ be a toroidal compactification of $Y$.

For any tuple of integers $\underline k$ we have the usual sheaf $\omega^{\underline k}$. The space of modular forms of weight $k$ is $H^0(Y,\omega^{\underline k})= H^0(X,\omega^{\underline k})$ (let us suppose that the genus of $Y$ is greater than $1$). The space of cuspidal forms is defined as $H^0(X,\omega^{\underline k}(-D))$, where $D$ is the divisor of the boundary of $X$.

Let $X^\ast$ be the minimal compactification of $Y$ and let $\pi \colon X \to X^\ast$ be the canonical morphism. Of course we have $H^0(X,\omega^{\underline k}) = H^0(X^\ast,\pi_\ast\omega^{\underline k})$, so we can define modular forms as section of some sheaf on the minimal compactification (of course the sheaf need not to be locally free).

Let $I$ be the sheaf of ideals on $X^\ast$ that gives the boundary of $X^\ast$ (that is not a divisor in general). Is it true that we have $$ H^0(X,\omega^{\underline k}(-D)) = H^0(X^\ast,\pi_\ast\omega^{\underline k} \otimes I) ? $$ In other words, can we define cuspidal forms using the minimal compactification?

A related question is the following: can we consider the space $H^0(X,\omega^{\underline k} \otimes \pi^\ast I)$?

Note that $I$ is not locally free, so we cannot use the projection formula.

Thank you!

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

3
$\begingroup$

Let $i \colon \Delta \to X^\ast$ be the closed immersion corresponding to the boundary of $X^\ast$. You have an exact sequence $$ 0 \to I \to \mathcal O_{X^\ast} \to i_\ast \mathcal O_\Delta \to 0 $$ but, as you said, $\pi_\ast \omega^{\underline k}$ is not locally free in general, so, after tensoring with $\pi_\ast \omega^{\underline k}$ we only have the exact sequence $$ I \otimes \pi_\ast \omega^{\underline k} \to \pi_\ast \omega^{\underline k} \to i_\ast \mathcal O_\Delta \otimes \pi_\ast \omega^{\underline k} \to 0 $$ so the correct sheaf to consider is $$ \ker(\pi_\ast \omega^{\underline k} \to i_\ast \mathcal O_\Delta \otimes \pi_\ast \omega^{\underline k}). $$

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.