the lebesgue integral $ \int_{[0,1]} 1_{\mathbb{Q}} dm = 0 $ . and if we integrate the complement $ \int_{[0,1]} 1_{\mathbb{Q}^C} dm =1 $ which is the same as $\int_{[0,1]} dm $ to me this is still a bit of a mystery to there are $\infty $ rationals in the interval $[0,1] $ yet if we exclude all these rational the measure is still the same as if we included the set $\mathbb{Q} \cap [0,1] $ . why is that, i know the measure of a countable set is zero, but why i cant find an explanation for this, but how can a set with cardinality of $\infty$ still be zero
Remember to vote up questions/answers you find interesting or helpful (requires 15 reputation points)
|
-1
|
||||||
|
closed as too localized by Pete L. Clark, S. Carnahan♦, François G. Dorais♦, Qiaochu Yuan, Joel David Hamkins Mar 14 2010 at 0:14 |
|
4
|
It is perhaps instructive to note that there is an open subset of This is a bit counterintuitive of course, since there doesn't seem to be a whole lot of room outside of $U$, yet the complement of $U$ has infinite measure. If you think about it, it must mean that even though $U$ is the countable union of open intervals, the complement of $U$ has an uncountable number of components, each consisting of just one point. (Any connected subset of |
||
|
|
You can accept an answer to one of your own questions by clicking the check mark next to it. This awards 15 reputation points to the person who answered and 2 reputation points to you.
|
2
|
A single point has measure zero. A countable set is the countable union of points, and since the measure is countably additive, you have that the measure is the sum of the measure of the single points. |
|||||||||
|

