Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Let $G$ be a finite perfect group. Are there any results on the number of elements of $G$ which can be written as a commutator? When $G$ is finite non-abelian simple group, then every element can be written as a commutator.

share|improve this question
3  
It's clearly at most $|G/Z(G)|^2$, which can be arbitrarily small as a fraction of $|G|$. See mathoverflow.net/questions/179834 –  Derek Holt Sep 4 at 19:18

1 Answer 1

up vote 8 down vote accepted

The proportion of elements of a finite group $G$ which are commutators is at least $\frac{1}{k(G)}$ (and the inequality is strict for non-Abelian groups) where $k(G)$ is the number of conjugacy classes of $G,$ because there are $|G|^{2}$ expressions of the form $[a,b]$ and every element of $G$ has at most $k(G)|G|$ expressions of the form $[a,b]$ (and only at the identity can that bound be achieved). Hence the number of distinct commutators in $G$ is at least $\frac{|G|^{2}}{k(G)|G|} = \frac{|G|}{k(G)}.$

On the other hand (apart from the obvious example of Abelian groups where the boound is clearly sharp), a non-Abelian extraspecial $2$-group $G$ of order $2^{2n+1}$ has only $2$ commutators, and has $k(G) = 2^{2n} + 1,$ so $\frac{|G|}{k(G)} \to 2$ as $n \to \infty,$ while we always have $\frac{|G|}{k(G)} < 2.$ Hence the proportion of commutators can get arbitrarily close to $\frac{1}{k(G)}$ for non-Abelian groups

share|improve this answer
    
But note that the question was about perfect groups. –  Derek Holt Sep 4 at 19:40
    
@Derek Holt: Oops, I missed that. I still wonder if one can asymptotically do much better than this proportion, even for perfect groups, especially in light of your comment. –  Geoff Robinson Sep 4 at 21:28
    
Do we have any results on the number of conjugacy classes of simple or perfect groups? –  user114539 Sep 5 at 4:49
    
Fulman and Guralnick proved that if $G$ is almost simple, then we have $k(G) <|G|^{0.41}$. Guralnick and I proved that we have $k(G) < (k(F)|G|)^{1/2}$ for an arbitrary finite group $G$, where $F = F(G)$ is the Fitting subgroup of $G$- I am not sure if the latter bound can be improved for perfect $G.$ –  Geoff Robinson Sep 5 at 7:09

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.