MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let $H$ be an $\infty$-dimensional separable Hilbert space and $B(H)$ the algebra of bounded operators.
Let $\mathcal{A}$, $\mathcal{B} \subset B(H)$ be ${\rm II}_1$-factors such that $\mathcal{A}'$, $\mathcal{B}'$ are also ${\rm II}_1$-factors and $\mathcal{A} \cap \mathcal{B} = \mathbb{C}$.

(1) Take $\mathcal{B} = \mathcal{A}'$ then $\mathcal{A} \cap \mathcal{B} = \mathbb{C}$ by definition of a factor.
(2) Take $(\mathcal{A}' \subset \mathcal{B})$ an irreducible subfactor, then $\mathcal{A} \cap \mathcal{B} = \mathbb{C}$ by definition of irreducibility.

Obviously $\langle \mathcal{A}' , \mathcal{B}' \rangle = \mathbb{C}' = B(H)$, with the notation $\langle S \rangle := (S \cup S^* \cup \mathbb{C}) ''$.

Question: Is it also true that $\langle \mathcal{A} , \mathcal{B} \rangle = B(H)$, or equivalently, that $\mathcal{A'} \cap \mathcal{B'} = \mathbb{C}$ ?
Else, what are counterexamples?

Remark: It's true for the examples (1) and (2).

share|cite|improve this question

migrated from Aug 1 '14 at 15:44

This question came from our site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields.

@ougao: I don't understand where you use $N$ for building $\mathcal{A}$ and $\mathcal{B}$, perhaps there is a typo. – Sebastien Palcoux Jul 30 '14 at 21:04
up vote 3 down vote accepted

No, this is trivially false. Start with $\mathcal{A}, \mathcal{B} \subset B(H)$ that are not a counterexample and define $$\mathcal{A}^{(2)} = \{A \oplus A \in B(H \oplus H): A \in \mathcal{A}\}$$ and $$\mathcal{B}^{(2)} = \{B \oplus B \in B(H \oplus H): B \in \mathcal{B}\}.$$ They and their commutants are still $II_1$ factors and their intersection is still trivial, but their commutants $M_2(\mathcal{A}')$ and $M_2(\mathcal{B}')$ now intersect in the scalar matrices. The answer is now in its true, correct, and final form. I will notify the Cyber Police of any additional unauthorized edits.

share|cite|improve this answer
I rolled back Sebastien's edit, which seemed to change completely the meaning of what Nik Weaver wrote – Yemon Choi Aug 1 '14 at 17:54
However I agree with part of Sebastien's edit, namely that you probably mean M2 of A', etc – Yemon Choi Aug 1 '14 at 17:56
Sorry, I pressed enter before I was finished ... I was saying, now replace with $\mathcal{A}\otimes\mathcal{M}$ and $\mathcal{B}\otimes\mathcal{N}$ where $\mathcal{M}$ and $\mathcal{N}$ are $II_1$ factors with trivial intersection whose commutants have nontrivial intersection. – Nik Weaver Aug 1 '14 at 18:38
Honestly? I think you should spend a couple of days working on it yourself before opening a new post. Otherwise it feels like you are abusing the community's goodwill to have people do your thinking for you. Just my opinion. – Nik Weaver Aug 1 '14 at 19:28
@SébastienPalcoux: if you've answered the infinite dimensional question, perhaps you could say so in an edit to your original post, to give the answer some visibility. – Nik Weaver Aug 3 '14 at 2:56

Transformation of the answer of Nik, for an hyperfinite infinite dimensional intersection:

He gave the counterexample $(\mathcal{A} \otimes I_2)' \cap (\mathcal{B} \otimes I_2)' \simeq M_2(\mathbb{C})$, for $\mathcal{A}$, $\mathcal{A'}$, $\mathcal{B}$, $\mathcal{B'}$ ${\rm II}_1$-factors and $\mathcal{A} \cap \mathcal{B} = \mathcal{A'} \cap \mathcal{B'} = \mathbb{C}$.
Let two states on $(\mathcal{A} \otimes I_2)^{\otimes \infty}$ and $(\mathcal{B} \otimes I_2)^{\otimes \infty}$ generating ${\rm II}_1$-factors $\mathcal{M}=\overline{(\mathcal{A} \otimes I_2)^{\otimes \infty}}$ and $\mathcal{N}=\overline{(\mathcal{B} \otimes I_2)^{\otimes \infty}}$ such that $\mathcal{M'}=\overline{(\mathcal{A'} \otimes M_2(\mathbb{C}))^{\otimes \infty}}$ and $\mathcal{N'}=\overline{(\mathcal{B'} \otimes M_2(\mathbb{C}))^{\otimes \infty}}$ are ${\rm II}_1$ factors, $\mathcal{M} \cap \mathcal{N} = \mathbb{C} $ and $\mathcal{M'} \cap \mathcal{N'} \simeq \overline{M_2(\mathbb{C})^{\otimes \infty}} \simeq \mathcal{R}$ the hyperfinite ${\rm II}_1$-factor.
For more details about infinite tensor product of von Neumann algebras, see this answer of Nik.

Generalized question (posted here):
Let $\mathcal{A}_1 \dots \mathcal{A}_n \subset B(H)$ be ${\rm II}_1$-factors such that $\forall i \, \, \mathcal{A}_i'$ is also a ${\rm II}_1$-factor and $\bigcap_i \mathcal{A}_i = \mathbb{C}$.
Is it true that $\bigcap_i \mathcal{A}'_i$ is hyperfinite? Else, what are counterexamples?

share|cite|improve this answer
Seems like some justification is needed, but I think this works. – Nik Weaver Aug 3 '14 at 18:18

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.