MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

k is an alegraically closed field and A is a commutative k-algebra. We also know that A is a Noetherian domain and its Krull dimension is one. Are there any necessary and sufficient conditions on A under which A becomes finitely generated module over a polynomial algebra k[c] for some c in A? Does anybody know any papers or books that discuss this? Thanks guys.

share|cite|improve this question
The answer seems to be that it is necessary and sufficient for $A$ to be finitely generated as a $k$-algebra. Necessity: finitely generated as a module implies finitely generated as an algebra, and finitely generated over finitely generated is finitely generated. Sufficiency: apply Noether normalization as suggested in the responses below (e.g. Eisenbud, Thm. 13.3). This has an evident generalization to any finite Krull dimension. – Pete L. Clark Mar 10 '10 at 13:16
+1 for catching my error, Prof. Clark. – Harry Gindi Mar 10 '10 at 13:29

Dear Amitsur,

It might help you to think geometrically. For example, $k[x,x^{-1}]$ is the ring of functions on a hyperbola $xy = 1$, and the projection from this hyperbola to the line $x = y$ is a finite projection. This corresponds to the fact that $k[x,x^{-1}]$ is finitely generated as a module over $k[x + x^{-1}].$ (If we write $f = x + x^{-1}$, then $x^2 - f x +1 = 0$ and $x^{-2} - f x^{-1} + 1 = 0$.)

share|cite|improve this answer

This is always the case, by Noether normalization. For a proof, see for examlple, Eisenbud - "Commutative algebra with a view towards algebraic geometry" - Theorem 13.3.

Edit: this is false, one need a finiteness assumption. See comments below.

share|cite|improve this answer
It's clearly not always the case, because A could be L[T], a polynomial ring in one variable over a field L which is a huge algebraically closed field and a transcendental extension of k – Kevin Buzzard Mar 10 '10 at 13:03
you are right off course. My mistake, I misread the question. – the L Mar 10 '10 at 13:05
This is incorrect. If $A$ is a finitely generated module over $k[t]$, then in particular $A$ is a finitely generated $k$-algebra, hence a Hilbert-Jacobson ring. The Laurent series ring $k[[t]]$ is a PID (and not a field) with only finitely many prime ideals, hence not Hilbert-Jacobson: see e.g. Section 8 of – Pete L. Clark Mar 10 '10 at 13:06

This follows from a direct generalization of the Noether normalization lemma. It is covered in these notes from Mel Hochster. These notes prove it in a pretty general form (when the base ring is only an integral domain rather than a field).

Edit: A sufficient condition is that the algebra is finitely generated, but it is clearly not necessary.

Edit 2: I misread the question. I thought he was asking if A is finitely generated over some polynomial algebra (including infinitely generated polynomial algebras).

share|cite|improve this answer
Thank you guys. I'll check the sources you gave me. So, the Laurent polynomial ring A=k[x,x^{-1}] must be finitely generated k[f]-module for some f in A then. This is kind of strange, isn't it? – Amitsur Mar 10 '10 at 13:02
See the comments above. This is incorrect (note: being finitely generated over k is clearly necessary.) – Pete L. Clark Mar 10 '10 at 13:06
Dear Amitsur, perhaps it seems less strange if you realize that you can take f=x+x^{-1} and that x then satisfies the equation x^2-fx+1=o, so that 1 and x generate A as a k[f]-module . – Georges Elencwajg Mar 10 '10 at 13:46
lol, of course! Thanks Georges Elencwajg. I guess I need to get some rest. Thank you all for your useful comments. – Amitsur Mar 10 '10 at 13:57

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.