MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

The connectedness of the moduli space $\mathcal{M}_g$ of complex algebraic curves of genus $g$ can be proven by showing that it is dominated by a Hurwitz space of simply branched d-fold covers of the line, which in turn can be shown to be connected by proving the transitivity of the the natural action of the braid group on n-tuples of transpositions in $S_n$ with product 1, which generate $S_n$: in this action, a generator $\sigma_i$ of the braid group acts as

$$(g_1, ... g_n) \to (g_1, ... g_{i+1}, g_i^{g_{i+1}}, g_{i+2}, ..., g_n)$$

This argument is often referred to as "a theorem of Clebsch (1872 or 1873), Luroth (1871), and Hurwitz (1891)." Does anyone know the history of this argument more precisely, and in particular which parts are due to Luroth, which to Clebsch, and which to Hurwitz?

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 6 down vote accepted

I was able to find the resources online (6 years after this question was asked):

I think it's pretty clear Luroth was first, but Hurwitz developed this material much further.


I get thrown off because we way Riemann surface is just a polygon with edges glued together, and that's pretty much the picture of moduli space painted here.

share|cite|improve this answer

Does this help a little?

"In a 1891 paper, Hurwitz explains how the set of degree d simple covers (all fibers consist of at least d-1 points) P1 (the projective line – Riemann sphere) has a structure of complex manifold. In this he follows a much earlier (1867) paper of Clebsch who showed the connectedness of the space of simple covers. Hurwitz's paper thereby applies to show the connectedness of the moduli space of compact surfaces of genus g."

If nothing else this may point you to folks who may know (Pierre Debes and Mike Fried).

share|cite|improve this answer

Harris and Morrison point you (after stating the theorem in 1.5.4) to Clebsch's Zur Theorie der Rieman'schen Flachen Math Ann. 6 216-230, 1872. My German is not that good, but section 2 seems convincing.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.