I have been asked to provide an "approximation at infinity" of an expression that at the end simplifies to $-\frac{b e^{-a t}-a e^{-b t}}{a-b}$, in a course about extreme value theory. In the course, we saw "approximations" such as $2 t^{-\alpha }-t^{-2 \alpha }$ being approximated to $2 t^{-\alpha }$ whatever the vague word approximation means. In words, this "approximation" states that the distribution tail is dominated by the term $2 t^{-\alpha }$ at infinity. I think that there is no polynomial term $t^{-\alpha }$ which dominates at infinity in the given question, since $e^{-k t}$ decreases faster than any term $t^{-\alpha }$. However, is there any sense in which this "approximation at infinity" can be taken? I tried to take the Taylor series at infinity and Mathematica returns the same expression (unevaluated?) and computing manually, the first order approximation of $e^{-k t}$ is 0. Any ideas or references about how to compute these sort of approximations in extreme value theory are appreciated.
Remember to vote up questions/answers you find interesting or helpful (requires 15 reputation points)
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
Do you have information on the relative sizes of $a$ and $b$? If we have, say $a>b$, then we can say that as $t \to \infty$, $-\frac{b e^{-a t}-a e^{-b t}}{a-b}=-e^{-b t}(\frac{b e^{-(a-b) t}-a }{a-b}) \sim \frac{a e^{-b t}}{a-b} =\frac{e^{-b t}}{1-\frac{b}{a}}$. It is rather simple, but I don't think there's much more that you can say about it. |
||
|
|
You can accept an answer to one of your own questions by clicking the check mark next to it. This awards 15 reputation points to the person who answered and 2 reputation points to you.
|
1
|
If $\alpha > 0$, then you have $$ \lim_{t \to \infty} {2t^{-\alpha} - t^{-2\alpha} \over 2t^{-\alpha}} = 1$$ and this is the sense in which such approximations are meant. Of course something stronger can be said -- how quickly do these limits go to 1? -- but usually when these approximations come without any qualifiers, this is what they mean. |
|||
|
|
1
|
Maple says it this way... |
||
|
|

