Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

A finite group $G$ has a finite set of irreducible representations over the complex numbers. All of these representations are linear (that is, are maps in 1x1 complex matrices) if and only if $G$ is abelian. Moreover, if the group $G$ is not abelian, those representations which are linear can be described by replacing $G$ by $G/G'$ (where $G'$ is the commutator subgroup.)

I need a similar classification in which the field of complex numbers is replaced by the quaternion division ring. Is there a similar theory? Can I classify those $G$ for which the quaternionic representations are linear? (Is it possible to even identify a normal subgroup $K$ of $G$ for which I am guaranteed that $G/K$ is "quaternionic linear"?)

I've identified some articles on "quaternionic" or "symplectic" representations but most of these are concerned with infinite groups and assume quite a lot of theory that does not seem relevant to finite groups.

(This mathoverflow question is similar but in that post $G$ is infinite and there is not the emphasis on "all representations are degree 1".)

share|improve this question
    
You can use the classification of finite subgroups of $\text{Sp}(1) \cong \text{SU}(2)$, right? The normal subgroup $K$ should be the intersection of the kernels of all homomorphisms to these finite subgroups. That's not very explicit, unfortunately. –  Qiaochu Yuan Jun 6 at 20:21
    
@QiaochuYuan That normal subgroup is too small. For example, for subgroups of $SU(2)$, only cyclic and quaternion groups satisfy this condition, not the dihedrals or symmetries of the platonic solids. –  Ben Webster Jun 6 at 20:54

2 Answers 2

up vote 7 down vote accepted

EDIT: My previous answer was completely wrong. Here's a corrected version.

First, note that this property descends to subgroups: every irrep of a subgroup is a summand of a restriction from the bigger group. Thus if all the irreps of the bigger group are 1-d, all the irreps of the small group will be their restrictions with the same one coming up multiple times.

If $G$ has $n$ 1-dimensional quaternionic representations whose sum is faithful, then $G$ must embed into the product of $n$ number of copies of the unit quaterions (that is, $SU(2)$). Consider the image of $G$ in any one of these representations, and then consider the image in $SO(3)$; since it is a finite subgroup of $SO(3)$, it is either cyclic, dihedral (including $C_2\times C_2$), or $A_4,S_4$ or $A_5$ (see Wikipedia). However, if it's nonabelian, this group has a real irrep (an irrep over the real numbers whose endomorphisms are $\mathbb{R}$, which is thus absolutely irreducible) which isn't 1-d, so it tensoring gives an irrep over the quaternions that isn't 1-d, so it must be cyclic or $C_2\times C_2$. This shows that the original subgroup of $SU(2)$ is either abelian, or the classic quaternion group.

Thus, $G$ is a subgroup of a product of cyclic and quaternion groups, and as we argued above, all such subgroups have this property.

EDIT: It's also worth mentioning that this shows that the notion of a maximal quaternionic linear subgroup exists: it's the quotient by the intersection of the kernel of all maps to abelian or $Q_8$ groups.

share|improve this answer
2  
Maybe I have misunderstood the question, but isn't every representation of the quaternion group of order 8 linear over the quaternions? –  Mark Wildon Jun 6 at 21:48
    
Yes, I would have thought that every representation of the quaternion group of order 8 would be "linear" over the quaternions. If G = $\langle x, y : x^4=y^4=1, yxy^{-1}=x^3, x^2=y^2 \rangle$ then I have four reps over the rationals. In addition I guess I could map $x$ to $\pm i$, $y$ to $\pm j$ but are there more than four of these options possible? Do I lose control of my set of irreducibles? (I am so comfortable with the complex field that I have no good intuition with the strange noncommutative quaternion division ring!) –  Ken W. Smith Jun 7 at 0:59
1  
To any future readers: the comments above refer to my (wrong) previous answer. –  Ben Webster Jun 7 at 13:30

The original question has been answered. As background information, I point out that S. Amitsur classified finite groups which can occur as subgroups of multiplicative groups of divison algebras. These include finite groups which have a faithful "one-dimensional" representation over the quaternions. As noted in Ben's answer, any such finite group (in the general division ring case) has cyclic Sylow $p$-subgroups for each odd prime $p$ and cyclic or generalized quaternion Sylow $2$-subgroups. It also satisfies other group-theoretic properties, such as elements of order $p$ and $q$ commuting when $p$ and $q$ are distinct primes.

In fact, finite groups which occur as subgroups of multiplicative groups of division algebras are Frobenius complements. We note that any generalized quaternion group already occurs - this is not in conflict with Ben's answer: if that group has order greater than $8,$ then it has a non-Abelian dihedral group as a homomorphic image, so not all its irreducible representations over the quaternions are $1$-dimensional. The only non-solvable group which occurs is ${\rm SL}(2,5),$ which does already occur inside the multiplicative group of the real quaternions ( as does each generalized quaternion $2$-group)- again, the fact that ${\rm SL}(2,5)$ has $A_{5}$ as a homomorphic image means that not all its irreducible representations over the quaternions are $1$-dimensional.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.