Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Let $(M,\omega)$ be a Kaehler manifold and $h$ be its Hermitian form, then in local sense we can write $$\omega=\partial\bar\partial\log h$$ and also if $f$ be the kaehler potential then we can write $$\omega=\partial\bar\partial\log f$$. So, my question is can say $f$ is equal to $h$ up to additional constant? if we have $f$ then how can we find $h$

share|improve this question
    
What's the Hermition (sic?) form of a Kahler metric? –  Gunnar Þór Magnússon Apr 24 at 19:21
    
Gunnar , I mean was hermitian form –  Hassan Jolany Apr 24 at 20:19
    
But what is the "Hermitian form" of a Kahler manifold? When I google it, it is defined to be the $(1,1)$-form $\omega$. –  Deane Yang Apr 24 at 23:03
    
Here you can see in equation 1.11. sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/039304409090019Y $h$ is hermitian structure –  Hassan Jolany Apr 25 at 13:47
    
I guess $h$ here is $g=h+i\omega$, –  Hassan Jolany Apr 25 at 13:55

1 Answer 1

up vote 1 down vote accepted

The function $\psi:=\log(fh^{-1})$ satisfies $\partial\bar\partial \psi=0$, because $ \partial\bar\partial\log f=\partial\bar\partial\log h =\omega$. Such functions are called pluriharmonic. Locally a pluriharmonic function is a real part of a holomorphic function, by Poincare-Dolbeault-Grothendieck lemma. This fact is true globally, because any real-valued holomorphic function vanishes, and therefore the local holomorphic functions can be glued together. Then, $h$ is unique (up to a constant multiplier) if and only if the manifold has no non-constant global holomorphic functions.

share|improve this answer
    
The question here is if $h(s_1,s_2)$ (with sections $s_i$)be hermitian structure then how can we find $h$ by using kahler potential $f$? –  Hassan Jolany Apr 25 at 14:31
    
If $h$ is the Hermitian form, what is the meaning of $\log h$? –  Paul Reynolds Apr 26 at 17:41
    
It makes no sense, of course; I assumed that the poster confused a metric with its potential –  Misha Verbitsky Apr 27 at 16:14
    
See sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/039304409090019Y in equation 1.11, IN FACT , $h$ is hermitian metric corresponding to hermitian form, so $\log h$ here must means $\log \hat h$ which $\hat h$ is hermitian metric corresponding to hermitian form in local trivialization –  Hassan Jolany Apr 27 at 18:24
    
I don't have access to this article; but anyway, $dd^c$ cannot be applied to metric, or to its logarithm. –  Misha Verbitsky Apr 27 at 23:38

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.