MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let $(M,\omega)$ be a Kaehler manifold and $h$ be its Hermitian form, then in local sense we can write $$\omega=\partial\bar\partial\log h$$ and also if $f$ be the kaehler potential then we can write $$\omega=\partial\bar\partial\log f$$. So, my question is can say $f$ is equal to $h$ up to additional constant? if we have $f$ then how can we find $h$

share|cite|improve this question
What's the Hermition (sic?) form of a Kahler metric? – Gunnar Þór Magnússon Apr 24 '14 at 19:21
Gunnar , I mean was hermitian form – baba ab dad Apr 24 '14 at 20:19
But what is the "Hermitian form" of a Kahler manifold? When I google it, it is defined to be the $(1,1)$-form $\omega$. – Deane Yang Apr 24 '14 at 23:03
Here you can see in equation 1.11. $h$ is hermitian structure – baba ab dad Apr 25 '14 at 13:47
I guess $h$ here is $g=h+i\omega$, – baba ab dad Apr 25 '14 at 13:55
up vote 2 down vote accepted

The function $\psi:=\log(fh^{-1})$ satisfies $\partial\bar\partial \psi=0$, because $ \partial\bar\partial\log f=\partial\bar\partial\log h =\omega$. Such functions are called pluriharmonic. Locally a pluriharmonic function is a real part of a holomorphic function, by Poincare-Dolbeault-Grothendieck lemma. This fact is true globally, because any real-valued holomorphic function vanishes, and therefore the local holomorphic functions can be glued together. Then, $h$ is unique (up to a constant multiplier) if and only if the manifold has no non-constant global holomorphic functions.

share|cite|improve this answer
The question here is if $h(s_1,s_2)$ (with sections $s_i$)be hermitian structure then how can we find $h$ by using kahler potential $f$? – baba ab dad Apr 25 '14 at 14:31
If $h$ is the Hermitian form, what is the meaning of $\log h$? – Paul Reynolds Apr 26 '14 at 17:41
It makes no sense, of course; I assumed that the poster confused a metric with its potential – Misha Verbitsky Apr 27 '14 at 16:14
See in equation 1.11, IN FACT , $h$ is hermitian metric corresponding to hermitian form, so $\log h$ here must means $\log \hat h$ which $\hat h$ is hermitian metric corresponding to hermitian form in local trivialization – baba ab dad Apr 27 '14 at 18:24
I don't have access to this article; but anyway, $dd^c$ cannot be applied to metric, or to its logarithm. – Misha Verbitsky Apr 27 '14 at 23:38

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.