Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Let $f\in L^{1}(\mathbb T)$ and define the Fourier coefficient of $f$ : $\hat{f}(n)=\frac{1}{2\pi} \int _{-\pi}^{\pi} f(t) e^{-int} dt; (n\in \mathbb Z)$.Consider the space, $$A(\mathbb T):= \{f\in L^{1}(\mathbb T): \hat{f}\in \ell^{1}(\mathbb Z), \ \text {that is,} \ \sum_{n\in \mathbb Z} |\hat{f}(n)| < \infty \}.$$ $A(\mathbb T)$ is normed by the $L^{1}-$ norm on $\mathbb Z$: $$||f||= \sum_{n\in \mathbb Z} |\hat{f}(n)|; \ \text {for} \ f\in A(\mathbb T). $$ We also note that $A(\mathbb T)$ is a Banach algebra under pointwise addition and multiplication. Let $f_{0}\neq 0 \in A(\mathbb T)$ and fix it; and take $M= 2||f_{0}||$ and put $B_{M}= \{f\in A(\mathbb T): ||f||\leq M \}.$

Let $f, g \in B_{M}.$

My Question: Can we expect $\left\||f|^{2}f-|g|^{2}g\right\|\leq C ||f-g||$ , where $C$ is some constant ? If yes, what can we say about $C$ ?

I guess, the trivial relation: $|f|^{2}f-|g|^{2}g=(f-g)|f|^{2}+g(|f|^{2}-|g|^{2})$; may be useful.

Thanks,

share|improve this question

1 Answer 1

up vote 3 down vote accepted

What's your motivation?

The Fourier transform is a *-homomorphism for the natural adjoint on $\ell^1(\mathbb Z)$ and so if $f$ is the transform of $a\in\ell^1(\mathbb Z)$ then $|f|^2f$ is the transform of $a^*aa$. Similarly let $g$ and $b$ be related. As $\|a\|,\|b\| \leq M$ we perform a simply triangle-inequality argument, which is valid in any Banach $*$-algebra: \begin{align*} \| a^*aa - b^*bb\| &= \| (a^*-b^*)aa + b^*(a-b)a + b^*b(a-b) \| \\ &\leq \|a-b\|\|aa\| + \|b\| \|a\| \|a-b\| + \|b^*b\| \|a-b\| \leq 3M^2\|a-b\|. \end{align*}

share|improve this answer
    
Your constant depends on $a$ and $b$. The point is a uniform constant. But maybe your estimates can be made sharp disproving the conjecture of the OP. –  Marc Palm Mar 6 at 14:12
2  
But that's not what the question asked: $f_0$ is fixed, this gives $M$ and then the OP specifically asks only for $f,g\in B_M$. If it was meant to be uniform, then why both with the $B_M$ condition? –  Matthew Daws Mar 6 at 14:28
    
Although, I must say that the whole $M=2\|f_0\|$ thing is very mysterious... –  Matthew Daws Mar 6 at 14:30
    
Ah okay, I didn't carefully read, where $f$ and $g$ are living! –  Marc Palm Mar 6 at 15:18
    
@MD; thanks; my motivation was to prove contraction in the space $C([0, T];M^{p,1})$; for detail, please have look on my previous question ; on the torus modulation space coincide with $A(T)$; thanks for the attention; –  Inquisitive Mar 6 at 15:44

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.