Sign up ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Let $f: (X,x)\rightarrow (\mathbb C,0)$ be a deformation of a curve singularity $(X_0,x)$, and let $f: X \rightarrow T$ be a sufficiently small representative. Assume that $(X,x)$ is reduced and pure dimensional, and for all $t\in T$, $t\not =0$, the fibers $X_t:=f^{-1}(t)$ are smooth curve singularities. Is it true then that $X_0$ is reduced at $x$?

I have a counter example for this question in the case $X$ is reduced but not pure dimensional (for that example, $X_t$ are smooth for all $t\not =0$, but they have two isolated points, whereas $X_0$ has an embedded non-reduced point at $0$).

share|cite|improve this question
I think I am misunderstanding the question: what about e.g. elliptic surfaces with multiple fibres? –  user5117 Feb 13 '14 at 15:38
Also, the phrase "smooth curve singularities" is confusing; do you mean that the fibers are smooth? –  user5117 Feb 13 '14 at 15:42
@Artie: $f:X \rightarrow T$ has smooth generic fibers who all are curve singularities. The special fiber maybe not smooth, but my question is, whether the smoothness of the generic fibers ensure for the reducedness of the special fiber (together with the pure-dimensionality of $X$, i.e., the generic fibers has no isolated points)? –  Trinh Feb 13 '14 at 16:06
Dear @user46910, I suppose I am objecting to saying that a smooth fiber is a "curve singularity". That seems needlessly complicated --- why not just say it is smooth? About your question, I am asserting there are fibred surfaces where the generic fibre is smooth, but some (scheme-theoretic) fibre is nowhere reduced. Is that the kind of example you are looking for? –  user5117 Feb 13 '14 at 16:10
To be more precise, e.g., any elliptic pencil on an Enriques surface. –  Alex Degtyarev Feb 13 '14 at 16:52

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.