If we have an elliptic curve E over a field k and we pick a non-square d in k-{0}. Suppose E is isomorphic to E^(d). (E^(d) is the quadratic twist) Why must j(E) = 1728 and why is k(sqrt(d)) = k(sqrt(-1))?
Remember to vote up questions/answers you find interesting or helpful (requires 15 reputation points)
|
1
|
||||
|
|
3
|
Various forms of $E$ over $k$ are classified by $H^1(k,Aut(E))$ and the quadratic twist corresponds to the image of the class $d\in k^\times/(k^\times)^2=H^1(k,{\mathbb Z}/2)$ under the map $H^1(k,{\mathbb Z}/2)\to H^1(k,Aut(E))$ induced by the map ${\mathbb Z}/2\to Aut(E)$ which sends nontrivial element of ${\mathbb Z}/2$ to the automorphism $x\mapsto -x$ of $E$. You are interested in the case when the image of $d$ under this map is zero. At the very least this means that $Aut(E)$ is strictly greater than ${\mathbb Z}/2$; but there are very few elliptic curves with this property.. |
||
|
|
You can accept an answer to one of your own questions by clicking the check mark next to it. This awards 15 reputation points to the person who answered and 2 reputation points to you.
|
7
|
To make things concrete, suppose that we're working in characteristic $\ne 2,3$ (we can do something similar in those cases, though it gets messier), and the equation of the curve is $E : y^2 = x^3 + a x + b$ and the equation of the twist is: $E^{(d)} : d y^2 = x^3 + a x + b$. Multiplying this by $d^3$: $(d^2 y)^2 = (d x)^3 + a d^2 (d x) + d^3 b$ for this to be isomorphic to $E$ over $k$ it is necessary and sufficient that there is a $\lambda \in k^*$ such that (see Silverman, or any other book on elliptic curves) such that $a d^2 = a \lambda^4$, $b d^3 = b \lambda^6$. If $a,b \ne 0$ then we must have $\lambda^6 = d^3$ and $\lambda^4 = d^2$, which shows that $\lambda^2 = d$ which you've ruled out. If $b=0$ you have, by taking square roots, $\lambda^2 = \pm d$, and only the minus sign is possible. If $a=0$ (and thus $b \ne 0$) then $\lambda^6 = d^3$. But then $(\lambda^3/d)^2 = d^3/d^2 = d$, which you've also ruled out. Thus, only $b=0$ is possible, which is $j=1728$. |
|||
|
|
|
0
|
That's correct Mr. Choi. It's a paper I am reading did not quite understand everything so I posted the questions. Thanks for the responses they were very helpful. |
||
|
|

