Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Given freely independent random variables $X_i$ with Marchenko-Pastur measures $\mu_i$, $i\in\{1,\dots,n\}$ how can we find the distribution of the scaled sum of these random variables $\sum_ia_iX_i$. (The measures are the empirical distributions of eigenvalues of symmetric random matrices.)

The answer seems to be free convolution of $\mu_i$, $i\in\{1,\dots,n\}$. To do that we can start with the R-transform. The R-transform of M-P measure $\mu_i$ is $R_i(z)=\frac{a_i}{1-\beta a_i z}$, where $\beta$ is the ratio of the dimensions of the random matrices. Now the R-trans of the sum distribution $R(z)$ is the sum of the R-transforms $R_i(z)$, $R(z)=\sum_i\frac{a_i}{1-\beta a_iz}$.

The question is how can one find the inverse of this $R(z)=\sum_i\frac{a_i}{1-\beta a_iz}$? So finally will have the law of $\sum_ia_iX_i$.

P.S.: Related to Random matrix determinant problem

share|improve this question

1 Answer 1

The following method is more or less doable in practice, depending on your coefficients $a_i$'s :

A solution is to use the Cauchy (sometimes called Stieltjes) transform. For a measure $\mu$, the Cauchy transform is defined by $$G(z):= \int \frac{1}{z-t}\mathrm{d}\mu(t)$$

By a combinatorial identity between moments and free cumulants, $$ R(G(z)) + \frac{1}{G(z)} = z $$

In the case of general $a_i$'s, finding an analytical expression for $G$ requires finding roots of a polynomial of degree $n$, but the calculation turns out to be very simple when $a_i$'s are equal for example.

Finally, you can use Stieltjes inversion formula to get an expression of the desired density. $$ \mathrm{d}\mu(t) = \frac{1}{\pi} \lim_{\epsilon\to 0} \Im{G(t+i\epsilon)} \mathrm{d}t $$

For a simple reference, you can have a look at part II, and especially around p. 94 and before, of the slides of a course given by R. Speicher in Bielefeld in last august Link to the Slides, or lecture notes available on the net by the same author, Combinatorics of free probability theory.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.